SRM EN 13211 ISOKINETIC SAMPLING COUPLED WITH ON-LINE AND


CONTINUOUS ANALYTICAL SYSTEM FOR MERCURY SPECIATION IN FLUE GAS: WASTE WATER TREATMENT SLUDGE IN A COMBUSTION / CO- COMBUSTION MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR CASE-STUDY


This work presents the results of 15 months from the start of the F.A.N.G.H.I. project (Lombardy Region: ERDF ROP 2014-2020 Innovation & Research Call Hub). The project provides for a total cost of € 9,904,708.53, a duration of 30 months starting in January 2020. The pandemic caused some of the project’s objectives to be postponed and for this reason the project will end at the end of 2022.


F.A.N.G.H.I. proposes an integrated approach to assess the health and environmental impact of two alternative strategies for sewage sludge disposal , incineration, and amendment to agricultural soils, to identify , the most sustainable from an energy, economic, health and environmental point of view . Mercury (Hg) in sewage waters and sewage sludge (SS) is a relevant topic which needs further studies to be understood in detail as well as to provide reliable estimates on the amount of mercury and its species released into the environment (Wang and Mao, 2019). In addition, there are very few studies on Hg emission linked to SS incineration. In Takaoda et al, 2012 authors reported results found for two Japanese fl uidized-bed type incinerators equipped with different Air Pollution Control Devices (APCDs): they found that Total Hg (THg) concentrations in the fl ue gases (36.6 μg/Nm3


and 21.1 μg/Nm3 on average) were


higher than those reported for other type of incineration plants in Japan. These evidences show the importance of monitoring Hg concentrations in emissions deriving from SS thermal treatment.


This work describes a method used to quantify THg emitted by SS thermal treatment in a mono-incineration and co- incineration condition. In Europe, the reference method EN 13211:2003 prescribes an isokinetic sampling for THg in order to properly collect also the dust phase and droplets generated by wet scrubbers. Unlike the reference method prescribes, THg speciation (i.e. Hg0 and Hg2+) and real-time acquisition is useful to better understand Hg emissions. Experimental tests were performed in isokinetic conditions, based on the continuous SnCl2 reduction and real-time CVAAS measurements (1 sec. acquisition time) on a WTE plant with a fl uidized bed combustion furnace treating dried and pelletized sludge (DPS) in a single combustion or in a co-combustion regime (DPS burned together with Refuse-Derived Fuel - RDF).


The approach to work was rather innovative: the Atomic Absorption Mercury Analyzer (NIC SGM-9) employed in this work is a real time device based on the atomic absorption spectroscopy principle, equipped with a gas treatment system in which the SnCl2 and KOH reagents are supplied at precise concentrations. This confi guration allows to measure at the same time the Elemental Mercury (EHg) and the Total Gaseous Mercury (TGHg) in the fl ue gas sample. In this setup the SnCl2 captures mercury Hg and KOH removes possible interferents: These reagents are required by international standards such as ISO 21741: 2020


By simply entering on-site conditions (ambient temperature, measured gas humidity and measured gas temperature) system automatically set the timing and volume of discharging liquid from the gas scrubbing bottles. In the fi rst setup (fi rst scrubber), the Hg2 + is reduced to Hg0 using a wet method (10% SnCl2 solution). Then, the sum of Hg0 is determined by means of the fi rst detector. The second setup is responsible for determination of Hg0 only. Interfering substances (e.g. HCl, SO2) are removed from the fl ue gas with a 10% KOH solution (second scrubber), the moisture is removed by the third scrubber, whose temperature is reduced to 5 ° C.


The solutions in the scrubbers may be discharged and replaced automatically at a specifi ed time. At determined intervals (typically every 60 s), the detector controls the background level using a gold trap which removes Hg from the fl ue gas and corrects the analytical signal. From the probe (TCR TECORA®


titanium rotative probe) to the analyzer a heated line


with thermoregulator is used in order to avoid condensation (temperature above 180 ° C)


Fig. 1 – WTE plant where Hg monitoring took place (courtesy of A2A Life company)


IET ANNUAL BUYERS’ GUIDE 2022/23


Particular attention has been given to the calibration of the instrument. An insulated chamber (gas box) with a vial inside with a


Fig 2 – Set of instruments used for monitoring


thermosealed thermocouple calibrated with an external temperature primary by NIST was used


Metallic mercury is taken with a gastight syringe and placed in the vial. From this, precise aliquots are taken from the vial and injected into a tedlar bag.


Amount of Hg contained in the air inside the chamber obtained from gas state equation allows to trace the amount of mercury injected into the tedlar bag that must be detected by the atomic absorption analyzer


Then, a series of mercury injections were carried out inside a tedlar bag.


A three-point calibration starting with a value of 4 micrograms and ending with approximately 16.50 micrograms was performed, with a good correlation between the estimated concentration and that measured by the atomic absorption of the analyzer.


At the same time isokinetic sampling collections on a quartz- fi ber fi lter and by absorption on K2Cr2O7 + HNO3 solution (EN 13211:2003) was performed in order to compare results from experimental tests and reference method.


Two campaigns lasting approximately 5 hours each were prepared in which 100% of RDF was burned in the WTE plant and 2 campaigns in which, in addition to RDF, DPS was burned with different loads.


The comparison could only be done with an analyzer as continuous as the AMS installed in the plant,a CEM which uses the photometric principle with Zeeman effect and for the calibration uses a vaporizer generating a gas starting from a solution of mercury chloride


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96