search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
8


Table 6: MRM parameters for anticonvulsants Name


Carbamazepine


Carbamazepine-10,11- Epoxide


Gabapentin Lamotrigine Levetiracetam Pregabalin Zonisamide


13C6-Zonisamide Lacosamide


D5-Phenobarbital Phenobarbital Phenytoin Topiramate Valproic Acid Clonazepam Diazepam


N-Desmethylclobazam Nitrazepam Nordiazepam Clobazam


pos pos


pos pos pos pos pos pos pos neg neg neg neg neg pos pos pos pos pos pos


Table 8: Anticonvulsant QC Results


Ionisation Quantification MRM CE(V)


237 > 192 -21 253 > 210 -12


172 > 154 -15 256 > 211 -26 171 > 126 -15 160 > 55 -22 213 > 132 -14 219 > 138 -15 251 > 108 -20 236 > 42 24 231 > 42 22 251 > 102 23 338 > 78 31 143 > 143 11 316 > 214 -38 285 > 193 -31 287 > 245 -18 282 > 236 -24 271 > 140 -27 301 > 259 -21


Table 7: Recovery results for anticonvulsants CBZ


Total Recovery (%)


EPO- CBZ


QC LOQ QC A QC B QC C


Mean %RSD


Pool A Pool B Pool A Pool B Pool A Pool B Pool A Pool B


101 108 98.7 101 114 113 104 97.6 105


103 109 103 104 110 112 105 99.6 106


GBP LMT


92.0 97.3 91.9 91.8 102 98.9 94.3 87.2 94.4


84.2 92.2 83.9 85.9 94.9 94.6 91.7 86.4 89.2


LVT


109 119 107 109 118 120 110 106 112


PGB ZNA LCA


89.4 96.4 90.0 90.9 102 99.9 95.5 88.4 94.1


82.6 91.3 82.2 84.8 94.1 93.1 88.8 82.2 87.4


86.9 95.4 88.1 90.4 99.6 98.9 94.5 88.7 92.8


PBR


81.8 90.9 83.0 77.5 90.7 88.6 85.0 78.8 84.5


6% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% 6% PNT QC LOQ QC A QC B QC C


Mean %RSD


Pool A Pool B Pool A Pool B Pool A Pool B Pool A Pool B


78.0 85.8 82.1 80.0 89.6 89.2 83.8 77.2 83.2


TPA VPA


75.9 86.8 77.5 79.4 88.1 86.9 79.3 73.7 81.0


(*) Excluded values due to plasma contamination. 6. Conclusion


LC-MS/MS has unique advantages and capabilities which make this technique a key technology asset in TDM laboratories. Advances in hardware engineering and software design are making a high impact for laboratories without the need for highly trained operators and this development is likely to continue to further automate assays and to expand the number of drugs measured by TDM. In this brief review, automated solutions for immunosuppressants and anticonvulsants have highlighted the considerable advance in integrated system designs for routine clinical pathology laboratories using LC-MS/MS.


81.1 87.3 83.1 85.0 93.6 91.7 88.0 80.4 86.3


CZP


105 125 83.8 94.9 92.3 89.1 89.2 84.3 91.2


DIA DM- CLBZ


80.3 96.1 77.1 82.4 88.0 89.0 86.0 79.1 84.8


77.3 84.2 83.2 88.1 95.5 93.7 90.2 83.2 86.9


NTZ NDIA CLBZ 82.7 84.2


93.9 121* 85.0 86.0 92.9 91.3 89.2 82.5 87.9


85.4 94.0 93.0 97.2 90.1 84.4 89.8


84.4 93.5 84.0 84.9 95.0 94.1 89.0 81.5 88.3


6% 7% 6% 8% 7% 7% 5% 6% 6% References


1. F. Saint-Marcoux, F.-L. Sauvage, P. Marquet. Anal. Bioanal. Chem 388 (2007) 1327-1349. 2. J.E. Adaway, B.G. Keevil. J. Chromatogr. B 883-884 (2012) 33-49. 3. P.J. Taylor, C.-H. Tai, M.E. Franklin, P.I. Pillans. Clin. Biochem. 44 (2011) 14-20. 4. M. Vogeser, C. Seger. J. Chromatogr. B 883-884 (2012) 1-2.


5. S. Barco, A. Zunino, A. D’Avolio, L. Barbagallo, A. Maffia, G. Tripodi, E. Castagnola, G. Cangemi. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 138 (2017) 142-145.


6. B. Toussaint, F. Lanternier, C. Woloch, D. Fournier, M. Launay, E. Billaud, E. Dannaoui, O. Lortholary, V. Jullien. J. Chromatogr. B 1046 (2017) 26-33.


7. V. Mistretta, N. Dubois, R. Denooz, C. Charlier. Acta Clinica Belgica 69 (2014) 53-61. 8. M. Himmelbasch. J. Chromatogr. B 883-884 (2012) 3-17. 9. B.G. Keevil, J. Fildes, A. Baynes, N. Yonan. Ann. Clin. Biochem 46 (2009) 144-145.


10. N. Yonan, R. Martyszczuk, A. Machaal, A. Baynes, B.G. Keevil. Clin Transplant. 20 (2006) 221-225.


11. W. Li, F.L.S. Tse. Biomed. Chromatogr. 24 (2010) 49-65.


12. P.M. Edelbroek, J. Van der Heijden, L.M.L. Stolk. Ther. Drug. Monit. 31 (2009) 327-336.


13. M. Vogeser, C. Seger. Clin. Chem. 56:8 (2010) 1234-1244. 14. T.M. Annesley. Clin. Chem. 49:7 (2003) 1041-1044. 15. B.K. Matuszewski, M.L. Constanzer, M. Chavez-Eng. Anal. Chem. 70 (1998) 882-889.


16. B.K. Matuszewski, M.L. Constanzer, M. Chavez-Eng. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 3019- 3030.


17. S.T. Wu, D. Schoener, M. Jemal. Rapid. Commun. Mass Spectrom. 22 (2008) 2873- 2881.


18. W. Tszyrsznic. A. Borowiec, E. Pawlowska, R. Jaswiec, D. Zochowska, I. Bartlomiejczyk, J. Zegarska, L. Paczek, M. Dadlez. J. Chromatogr. B 928 (2013) 9-15.


19. F. Aucella, V. Lauriola, G. Vecchione, G.L. Tiscia, E. Grandone. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 86 (2013) 123-126.


20. M. Fernandez, A. Jaffuel, F. Dayot, J.-F. Hoeffler, A. Huteau. 65th ASMS, Indianapolis (2017) Poster ThP086.


21. D. Vecchietti, C. Ghilardi, K. Kern, S. Moreau, I. Cabruja. 65th ASMS, Indianapolis (2017) Poster TP450.


Confirmation MRM CE(V)


237 > 165 -43 253 > 167 -35


172 > 137 -16 256 > 43 -53 171 > 69 -27 160 > 97 -14 213 > 77 -33 ---


---


251 > 91 -50 ---


---


231 > 188 11 251 > 208 16 338 > 96 25 ---


---


316 > 270 -25 285 > 154 -27 287 > 210 -31 282 > 180 -38 271 > 165 -27 301 > 224 -32


Dwell


Time (ms) 8 8


19 14 19 24 12 26 12 18 8 8 8


20 8 9 8 8 9 8


QC LOQ QC A Mean Accuracy


%RSD 2% 2% 0.8% 0.5% 3% 3% 0.7% 1% 8% Mean


Accuracy QC B


%RSD 3% 3% 0.5% 0.8% 3% 0.5% 0.3% 1% 5% Mean


Accuracy QC C


%RSD 3% 2% 0.2% 0.9% 2% 1% 0.8% 1% 3% Mean


Accuracy


%RSD 3% 4% 0.3% 1% 3% 0.3% 0.6% 1% 1% PNT


TPA VPA QC LOQ QC A Mean Accuracy


%RSD 12% 3% 3% 16% 2% 4% 6% 3% 2% Mean


Accuracy QC B


%RSD 4% 2% 2% 11% 0.6% 2% 2% 1% 2% Mean


Accuracy QC C


%RSD 3% 2% 1% 7% 0.7% 1% 1% 0.7% 0.7% Mean


98.6 99.7 100 102 104 103 104 102 107 Accuracy %RSD 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 0.5% 2% 2% 100 96.1 98.0 95.7 93.4 97.6 98.3 92.0 97.7 104 98.5 97.0 93.3 94.9 100 94.2 93.3 97.7


CZP DIA DM- CLBZ


NTZ NDIA CLBZ 105 111 102 112 90.3 102 102 89.5 107 110 111 103 103 107 103 104 102 98.5 100 103 98.9 98.1 100 98.1 95.1 100 99.1 103 98.1 102 99.6 98.1 108 94.4 106 97.2


CBZ EPO- CBZ


GBP LMT LVT PGB ZNA LCA PBR 103 99.6 110 105 100 110 115 100 109


Read, Share and Comment on this Article, visit: www.labmate-online.com/article


LAB ASIA - JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52