search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
35


Figure 1: Overlay of cannabinoid reference standard mixture and hemp extract separated using mobile phase at pH 10. The unknown constituent is marked by an asterisk.


Chromatographic orthogonality is the use of multiple separation mechanisms in order to gain additional analyte information. It is recognised that many cannabis laboratories may not have access to high-end scientific instrumentation therefore a simple approach to chromatographic orthogonality is most useful. Orthogonality was accomplished in this study using basic and acidic pH mobile phases on the same chromatographic platform (i.e. column and instrument) to identify an unknown constituent in cannabis extract.


Experimental Hemp Extract Preparation


At a partnering cannabis testing laboratory, hemp extract was generated from a 20 lb feed stock of Vermont grown hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) with seeds and stems removed. The buds


Table 1: Empirical formula of major cannabinoids and monoisotopic mass [16].


Cannabinoid Empirical Formula


Δ9 THC CBD CBC


Δ8 THC


THC-A CBD-A


THC-V CBD-V


CBG-A CBG


C22H30 C19H26


C22H32 C21


H32 CBN C21 H32 O4 O2


O4 O2


O2 358 286


360 316


310 C21H30 O2


Monoisotopic Mass


314


and leaves were ground, homogenised, and divided into five 4 lb bags. A sample was analysed from each bag with the average total cannabinoid content determined as 5.04 wt%. Six extractions were performed at the 5 L scale via a solvent- free Bio-Botanical Extraction System (SFE- BBES) (Waters, Milford, MA. USA).


Table 2: SFE – BBES extraction and collection conditions Extraction


Flow Rate Pressure


Temperature Time


Collection CS1 Pressure


CS1 Temperature CS2 Pressure


CS2 Temperature CS3 Pressure


CS3 Temperature


The cyclone separator 1 (CS 1) extracts were combined and homogenised. Ethanol was used to clean CS 1 post extraction. Approximately 85 g raw extract were added to 1.2 L of the ethanol wash, and the solution stored at -20o


C until analysis


and purification. Plant waxes were removed from the homogenised solution by vacuum filtration, and pigments were removed through a patent pending clarification strategy (Table 2).


Orthogonal Reversed-Phase Chromatography


Reversed-phase separations were performed using an ACQUITY H-Class UPLC System (Waters, Milford, MA. USA) equipped with a PDA (UV) detector at 228 nm, with a 4.8 nm resolution, and a 3D data λ range at 200-400 nm. The UHPLC was also equipped with a single quadrupole QDa (MS) detector with a programmed ESI (-) mass scan range of 100-600 Da, cone voltage at 15 V, capillary temperature of 500o


C and capillary voltage


Condition 170 g/min


344 bar 50o


C 210 nm


Condition 158 bar 45o


C


75 bar 40o


C


53 bar 35o


C


of 0.80 kV. An accessory fraction collector (Waters Fraction Manager – Analytical (WFM-A)) (Waters, Milford, MA. USA) was added for automated collection of the peak of interest. Separations were achieved using an ACQUITY CSH C18


, 130Å, 1.7µm, 2.1 mm x 50


mm column (Waters, Milford, MA. USA) at a temperature of 30o


C and a flow rate of 1.0 mL/


min. All data was collected and processed by Empower®


3 Chromatography Data Software.


A ‘turn-key’ chromatographic separation of the major cannabinoid reference standards (Cerilliant, Round Rock, TX. USA) cannabidivarian (CBD-V, C-140), tetrahydrocannabivarian (THC-V), cannabigerol (CBG, C-141), Δ9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9


–trans- -THC), Δ8


–trans-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8 T-032), cannabinol (CBN), Δ9


-THC, –trans-


tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THC-A), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A), cannabigerolic acid (CBG-A) and cannabichromene (CBC) prepared at 1.0 mg/mL in methanol was performed at pH 10 using 10mM ammonium bicarbonate (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile (mobile phase B).


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68