search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
25


the samples and with multiple analysts is quite remarkable and indicates that sample complexity does not limit this method in its ability to identify compounds. Certainly, it is the combination of technologies that enable the methodology to be so successful. The accurate mass, high resolution data enables formula identification while the database similarity and retention index search combine to verify the known unknowns. In particular, the GCxGC technology expands the chromatographically available space significantly, improving chromatographic resolution which leads to dramatically improved peak detection compared to traditional, single dimension chromatography.


Conclusions


We have addressed several of the goals of the study. By identifying up to 90% of the spiked standards we believe that this method and processing performs exceedingly well and the complexity of the mixture did not impact the performance of identifications. However, we have not yet evaluated the unintended components which likely resulted in these mixtures.


Many aspects of interpretation continue to be investigated and this will be done in future work. For example, performing the same GCxGC experiments on the neat standards of each analyte (almost 4000 injections!) to take our confidence of the identification to the highest level. We are very optimistic of the accuracy of identifications once that work is complete.


Acknowledgements


The authors would like to thank Drs. Elin Ulrich and Jon Sobus (US EPA) for their efforts in initiating and coordinating this trial. Dr. Elizabeth Humston-Fulmer, Dr. David Alonso and Christina Kelly (LECO- US) provided significant assistance in data acquisition, methodology development, data review, and analysis.


References


1. Sobus, J. R., et al. (2017). “Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA.” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.


2. Schymanski, Emma L., et al., “Identifying small molecules via high resolution mass spectrometry: communicating confidence”, Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:2097-2098.


3. Schymanski, Emma L., et al., Non-Target Screening high high-resolution mass spectrometry: critical review using a collaborative trial on water analysis”, Anal Bioanal Chem 2015, 407:6237-6255


4. “The History of the NIST/EPA/NlH Mass Spectral Database”, Today’s Chemist at Work February 1999 Today’s Chemist at Work, 1999, 8(2), 45-46, 49-50.


5. http://www.americanlaboratory. com/913-Technical-Articles/340911- Introduction-of-NIST-17-A-Major-Update- of-Mass-Spectral-Libraries-and-Software- at-the-65th-ASMS-Conference-on-Mass- Spectrometry-and-Allied-Topics/


6. Wallace, William E., et al. “Mass spectral library quality assurance by inter-library comparison.” Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry 28.4 (2017): 733-738.


7. Ausloos, P., et al. “The critical evaluation of a comprehensive mass spectral library.” Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 10.4 (1999): 287-299.


8. https://www.nist.gov/srd/nist-standard- reference-database-1a-v17


9. Sumner, Lloyd W., et al. “Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis working group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Iniative (MSI)” Metabolomics, 2007, 3(3), 211-221


10.EPA CompTox Chemistry Dashboard https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard


11.McLafferty, Fred W., Turecek, Franstisek, Interpetation of Mass Spectra, 4th edition, 1993


12.Matthew S. Klee, Jack Cochran, Mark Merrick, Leonid M. Blumberg, Evaluation of conditions of comprehensive two- dimensional gas chromatography that yield a near-theoretical maximum in peak capacity gain, Journal of Chromatography A, Volume 1383, 2015, Pages 151-159


13.Lee, Andrew L., A Model of Peak Amplitude Enhancement in Orthogonal Two-Dimension Gas Chromatography, anal. Chem., 2001, 73, 1330-1335


14.Simply GCxGC. Free online tool for understanding method optimization of GCxGC www.leco.com/simply-gcxgc


Video Shows Solvent Dry-Down for LC/MS Sample Preparation


Porvair Sciences has posted a new online video demonstrating how nitrogen blowdown evaporators offer a useful tool for removing the solvent dry-down bottleneck in LC/MS sample preparation.


In the new video the presenter demonstrates how nitrogen blowdown evaporators can quickly and easily remove most chromatographic solvents, enabling fast recovery of dry compounds and allowing re-suspension of unknown mixtures in optimised solvents for LC/MS analysis.


Additionally, the video introduces Porvair Sciences complete range of MiniVap and UltraVap blowdown evaporators.


Blowdown evaporators give significant throughput advantages to laboratories looking to optimise microplate sample preparation productivity. Faster than centrifugal evaporation, significant increases in sample throughput can be achieved through Porvair advanced


evaporator head technology and innovative manifold design, which directly injects heated nitrogen into each individual well of the microplate simultaneously. Porvair Sciences blowdown evaporators have been designed to be simple to install, operate and maintain. Installation requires only connection to a gas supply or cylinder and mains electricity. Safety of operation is ensured as the CE marked compact units fit into all fume cupboards. Both MiniVap and UltraVap blowdown evaporators may be operated with a supply of clean, dry compressed air in place of nitrogen, if the chemistry allows.


To watch the new video please visit https://youtu.be/DHSNCV4-s-s.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68