search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
32 February / March 2018


Figure 1a. TIC of strawberry matrix standard at reporting level (0.01 mg/kg for most pesticides).


Figure 1b. TIC of 2016 strawberry sample containing 16 pesticide residues (range 0.01 - 0.3 mg/kg) i.e. 15 positive MRM in red and 1 negative MRM in blue.


Figure 1c. XIC of boscalid (+MRM) for strawberry matrix standard at reporting level (0.01 mg/kg) and 2016 strawberry sample containing boscalid at 0.08 mg/kg.


thousand injections of crude extracts from a variety of matrices over approximately 9 months of continuous use.


The methodology was used throughout 2016 to analyse hundreds of fruit and vegetable samples as part of UK and EU monitoring programmes. A summary of the residues quantified and confirmed in 2016 is presented in Table 2.


Figure 2 shows the laboratory’s consistent performance in FAPAS proficiency tests (4 rounds) and EU proficiency tests (2 rounds) for LC/MSMS compounds in 2016. Z-scores must be in the range -2 to 2 to be acceptable. All 37 compounds in these proficiency tests that were analysed using this method had acceptable z-scores.


The consistent performance and stability of the instrument over time i.e. 100 injections using full acquisition method A incorporating polarity


Figure 2: SASA LCMSMS Proficiency Test Data 2016. Table 2: Summary of residue detected and quantified by LCMSMS in 2016 samples


Figure 1d. XIC of fludioxonil (+MRM) for strawberry matrix standard at reporting level (0.01 mg/kg) and 2016 strawberry sample containing fludioxonil at 0.1 mg/kg


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68