search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
These buildings were assembled by hand with skills developed over the generations and nurtured through the trade apprenticeship system. They were practically detailed to exclude and shed water and, viewed from today’s perspective, the process was almost entirely benign: everything was sustainable, renewable and carbon emissions in construction, if not in use, were negligible. The system, developed over centuries, worked in ways we are only now beginning to understand.


Paradoxically to the modern mind, this is because in traditional building, the materials and the construction as a whole were, in relative terms, soft, weak, flexible and permeable. Rainwater was shed or otherwise carried away from roofs, but the walls, protected by overhangs, cornices or drip- courses, were permeable. Moisture absorbed in driven rain penetrated the outer surfaces of the walls, but evaporated out again when the rain stopped and the sun came out. And, of course, dry walls always were – and are – warmer than wet walls.


It is well known that cement is incompatible with traditional building and that the use of cement mortar and the application of strong and impervious finishes are likely to make walls wetter. This is because moisture from the ground, minor leaks and fine surface cracks – which are almost inevitable when a brittle material is applied to a soft substrate – is prevented from evaporating out through the external wall surfaces. Attempts to exclude moisture with damp courses and impermeable membranes only exacerbate problems by causing wetness to build up.


It is perhaps less well-known that most stone and brick decay is caused by the crystallisation of soluble salts, as moisture evaporates from the surfaces. If the joints are impermeable, this process is concentrated in the immediately adjacent surfaces. Hard mortar causes sacrificial damage to the stones, while permeable mortar is less susceptible and more easily repaired.


Modern construction is the absolute opposite of traditional building. It employs materials which are manufactured, processed, transported and assembled by machines with a minimum of labour and skill. The materials – steel, concrete, glass, ceramics and plastic – are also hard, strong, inflexible and impermeable. They depend on waterproof and airtight membranes, so that water is excluded. In terms of moisture management, it is the difference between a tweed overcoat and a plastic mac!


Lime is the essential ingredient of traditional mortars and surface finishes. There are different sorts of lime and different ways of preparing and using them. At its simplest, what


90 Listed Heritage Magazine January/February 2020


Pointing and thrown harl on Lindisfarne Castle


is called ‘air lime’ is made by burning pure limestone in a kiln, driving off carbon dioxide. As the mortar cures, the carbon dioxide is re-absorbed. This so called ‘lime cycle’* is what makes lime mortar in its pure form ‘carbon neutral.’


For better or worse, the selection, specification, preparation and use of lime mortars requires knowledge and skill, which not every builder possesses. For the DIY owner, there are courses where the selection, preparation and use of lime mortars can be learned. For the careful and conscientious owner, the skills exist almost everywhere and, with a little trouble, can be found.


It will come as a surprise to most owners to learn that the more lime mortar there is on the surface of a wall, the better it will perform and the drier the wall will be. Full covering with a thrown harl or a floated plaster finish may be best of all. The recessed or ‘hungry’ joint, derived from 19th and 20th century Ancient-Monuments ruin-consolidation practice, has no place in traditional masonry and brickwork. Walls were commonly finished flat, or nearly so, and the word pointing referred not to ‘joint-filling’, but to the use of a pointed tool to strike joint lines on the finished surface!


In the end, however, besides the practical function of lime finishes in keeping walls dry and houses warmer than they might otherwise be, they can be utterly beautiful!


*For those with a basic knowledge of chemistry, the so called lime cycle – the burning of limestone to give quicklime; the slaking of the quicklime to produce mortar; and the setting (that is the drying and carbonation) of the mortar in or on the wall may be represented as follows:


1. CaCO3 – CO2 = CaO 2. CaO + 2H2O = Ca(OH)2 3. Ca(OH)2 + CO2 = CaCO3 + H2O


ABOUT THE BUILDING LIMES FORUM The Building Limes Forum exists to encourage expertise and understanding in the appropriate use of building limes and education in the standards of production, preparation, application and after-care. The Building Limes Forum is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation (SCIO) No SC033659 with over 400 members in the UK and overseas, the majority being actively concerned with the repair of historic buildings or in the use of lime in new builds.


James Simpson OBE HonDSc FRIAS FSAScot Consultant to Simpson & Brown, Architects Chairman the Building Limes Forum www.buildinglimesforum.org.uk


Images © Simpson & Brown


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180