search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Planning Appeal Case File


? When listed building consent is refused by a local planning authority in Scotland, the


applicant may appeal to the Scottish Ministers. A Reporter is appointed by the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) to determine the case.


Appeal against refusal to grant listed building consent (LBC) to form a new entrance screen within the large hall area of the existing dwelling at 98 Dundas Street, Edinburgh, EH3 6RQ 19/02982/LBC


Section 14(2) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1967 requires that special regard is given to the desirability of preserving the building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses. As the appeal site lies within the Edinburgh New Town Conservation Area, there is also a requirement to pay special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the conservation area.


The appeal premises comprise a ground floor flat at the northern end of a 4 storey tenement building, listed at category B and category A for the group. Although access to the property is on the ground floor, the slope of the road down to the north means that the door is accessed by a short flight of steps up and back from the pavement. Whilst the listing summarises the external architectural features of interest, it does not specify any relevant internal features of special architectural or historic interest.


The Council referred to Edinburgh Local Development Plan policy ENV4 in its reason for refusal. Policy ENV4 allows alterations which are justified, which do not unnecessarily damage the historic structure or diminish its


134 Listed Heritage Magazine January/February 2020


interest, and where additions are in keeping with other parts of the building. As this is an appeal against refusal of listed building consent, not planning permission, development plan policies do not have the status afforded to them by section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). Nevertheless, the policy was deemed to be a relevant consideration. Consideration was also given to the council’s Guidance on Listed Building and Conservation Areas (March 2018) and Historic Environment Scotland’s (HES’s) guidance note on Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Interiors (2016),


both of which advise that subdivision of spaces should normally be avoided.


The reporter considered the key features of the listed building relevant to the appeal to be the open lobby and the Doric columns within it. The proposed screen would be positioned across the lobby, splitting up the space between the door and the main hallway. Glazed panels, however, would constitute a significant proportion of the proposed screen, contributing to the open feel of the lobby and hallway, while still meeting the stated requirements of the appellant in terms of


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180