search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MEMBERS’ LETTERS


ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATES


There seems to be a lot of confusion about whether an EPC is required on a listed property. We own a listed commercial building and rent/lease units out. We are about to issue a new lease on one of the offices and our solicitor is saying we need an EPC but even he says it is not very clear? What would your advice be?


Your solicitor is correct, it is far from clear. There is as summary on the .gov.uk website relating to EPCs and commercial properties which reads as follows:


EXEMPTIONS You don’t need an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) if you can demonstrate that the building is any of these:


• listed or officially protected and the minimum energy performance requirements would unacceptably alter it


• a temporary building only going to be used for 2 years or less


• used as a place of worship or for other religious activities


• an industrial site, workshop or non- residential agricultural building that doesn’t use much energy


• a detached building with a total floor space under 50 square metres


• due to be demolished by the seller or landlord and they have all the relevant planning and conservation consents


VACANT BUILDINGS AND DEMOLITION A building is also exempt if all of the following are true:


• it’s due to be sold or rented out with vacant possession


• it’s suitable for demolition and the site could be redeveloped


• the buyer or tenant has applied for planning permission to demolish it


However, there is a catch, because to demonstrate an exemption under the first bullet point is virtually impossible unless you actually have an EPC. Only then can you reasonably establish what the ‘minimum energy performance requirements’ are and whether they would unacceptably alter the building. I see no way around this apparent catch 22 but to commission the EPC and then take a view, possibly with professional assistance, as to whether the minimum energy performance requirements would unacceptably alter the listed building.


There is some good advice on Historic England’s website but be careful because much of it relates to private rented property and not commercial buildings.


Peter Bell LPOC Conservation Advisor


WATER REPELLENTS: GOOD OR BAD?


We have a Georgian house which has a terrible problem with water soaking through one whole side. We have had someone to look that deals with listed buildings and is to supply us with a quote for repointing, but has mentioned Stormdry water repellent treatment. I have always thought any stuff that is water repellent was bad for the bricks. He says it is a breathable compound. What are your views?


You are right to be cautious. Leading heritage practitioners (including Historic England, SPAB and IHBC) are opposed to the use of any water repellent coatings on historic buildings. In brief the reasons are as follows:


• Water repellent coatings should not be necessary in any historic building which is properly maintained and repaired.


• The long term effects on the molecular structure of the wall surfaces are generally untested and unknown. It is always better to use traditional techniques which are tried and tested.


• The effect of coatings on the breathability of the structure tend to be untested. In the cases where there are test results they are often unpublished. In those cases where they are published there is always a reduction in breathability of the wall.


• Staining of the wall surface is not uncommon when water repellents are used.


• The effects of water repellant treatments are relatively short-lived. It is always preferable to carry out a long term repair.


The first steps should always be to check the effectiveness of rainwater goods (ideally in a good downpour) the condition of the pointing and any other potential sources of water ingress. Look out for cement pointing which may be trapping in moisture.


Careful repointing in a well specified lime mortar (in the spring, as it is too late to carry out any lime work before then) should avoid the need for any water repellent treatments.


The LPOC has a technical guide entitled Water Repellant Treatments and Listed Buildings if you want to read more about the subject.


Peter Bell LPOC Conservation Advisor


Find us on 42


The Listed Property Owners Club Follow us on Listed Heritage Magazine January/February 2020


@Listed_Property


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180