search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
24 INSIGHTS


© Alex de Rijke


The purpose of Cork House was more than achieving metrics and credentials – it is a perfect example of how structural testing and experimentation with new materials can help inform the environmental debate


more similarities to Lego than modern house construction. Cork House contains 1268 cork blocks assembled upon a cross-laminated timber (CLT) floorplate and founded on removable screw piles. The roof is formed from five corbelling truncated pyramids supported on timber edge members and valley lintels to span window and door openings and allow an open plan interior. Meticulous detailing of block interfaces by Matthew, Dido and Oliver, developed through experimentation on smaller test buildings and rigorously tested by BRE culminated in the weather-tight yet completely dry form of construction used on Cork House. While traditional methods of dry jointed roof construction have existed for millennia, often designed through trial and error and utilising the high self-weight compression for stability, the low density of the material led to interesting challenges for Arup such as relying on the ballast of the rooflights to prevent uplift under high winds.


Utilising the same material for both structure and insulation was also not without its challenges. Rather predictably, the denser the


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


Images © Matthew Barnett Howland


blocks, the stiffer they became – however, equally predictably, the thermal insulation performance suffered. It was therefore always going to be a careful balance between the different performance requirements demanded of the material. We also had to think about the creep behaviour under sustained loading, a long-term affect that cannot be easily replicated in short-term lab experiments. We applied our knowledge gained from other plant-based materials such as timber and bamboo to best predict the future compression of this inherently soft material.


There are many ways to present the sustainability credentials of a building. The Cork House was carbon-negative at completion – not a bad starting point. In numerical terms, the building is predicted to emit only 619 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent per square meter over its lifetime. An impressive figure, which will be evaluated though, a post-occupancy study. However, taking a step back, it is clear that a dwelling formed almost exclusively from a waste biogenic material that can be effortlessly deconstructed to its constituent parts and repurposed, must have a minimal footprint on the environment.


The purpose of Cork House was more than achieving metrics and credentials. It’s a perfect example of how structural testing and experimentation with new materials can help inform the environmental debate. It is not trying to provide the definitive solution for every project. Rather, it serves to inspire the innovators of our industry, and allay the naysayers, at a time when society is demanding that we all play our part in finding answers to climate change.


Gavin Maloney is a structural engineer at Arup


ADF OCTOBER 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100