This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES


ACCOUNTING FOR EMR


when the contract is awarded or when the initial obligations are met and generation has started?


UNCERTAINTIES AHEAD


Contracts for Differences (CfDs) are central to delivering Electricity Market Reform (EMR) in the UK. But the changes give rise to uncertainty around the accounting treatment, made all the more pertinent because of forthcoming fundamental changes to UK accounting standards.


EMR PROGRAMME AIM The EMR programme is being introduced with the aim of delivering green, reliable electricity for the future, at the lowest possible cost. CfD auctions begin in October 2014 and wind generators will need to understand the impact of the CfD model on the accounting and cash tax profile for each project.


In advance of the introduction of the EMR programme, eight projects (including six wind) have already been given a CfD, known as an investment contract under the ‘Final Investment Decision


Enabling for Renewables’ programme.


NOTHING STRAIGHTFORWARD With such CfDs in the energy market being both new and complex, accounting for them is unlikely to be straightforward and many approaches have been proposed – as a derivative, as a grant or simply on an accruals basis.


Treatment as a grant would likely lead to less volatility in the profit and loss account but there would still be questions to be resolved, such as whether it should be accounted for when the energy is generated or capitalised at opening fair value, and whether it should be a revenue or capital item.


POSSIBLE OUTCOMES


This debate has some way to run, but in the end, while it would impact the earnings profile of the project, the corporation tax profile will always be based on treating the CfD as a derivative contract and basing taxable amounts on accounting profits and losses.


If certain UK tax provisions known as the ‘Disregard Regulations’ apply, then the fair value of profits and losses on CfDs would be disregarded as they arise and only brought into account for tax purposes when the related income is brought into the profit and loss account, yielding a profile of taxable profit/loss more akin to accruals accounting.


DECISIONS


Companies will need to decide in due course whether to opt into this regime or (if relevant criteria can be met) to rely on hedge accounting to dampen the cash tax impact of fair value volatility. Ongoing consultation by HMRC could potentially impact the taxation of derivatives in the future and needs to be monitored.


Kate Mitchell


Another factor is whether the business prepares its accounts using UK GAAP or IFRS, although the forthcoming introduction of accounting standard FRS 102 will align the two.


EXAMPLE


By way of example of the potential complexity, if accounted for as a derivative, the contract would need to be fair valued on day 1 and then over the life of the contract. However, there are difficulties in establishing when ‘day 1’ should be – should the asset and gain be accounted for


88 www.windenergynetwork.co.uk Click to view more info


EARLY ENGAGEMENT ADVISED Whilst some businesses may regard the existence of uncertainties over certain aspects of the accounting and tax as a reason to adopt a ‘wait and see’ approach, in our view there is merit to be had in engaging early in the debate so that the different technical arguments can be understood and an appropriate, well considered approach adopted for financial modelling purposes or in the financial statements of the business.


Kate Mitchell PwC


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100