This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Operators are moving away from inflexible contracts and working harder to retain members with a quality product


dave courteen fitness express/mosaic • managing director and founder


“M


y view is that we should definitely scrap contracts as


the only option offered. The Fitness Industry Association has worked hard to create a credible sense of what clubs can do for people’s health and wellbeing, and contracts undermine this with the negative publicity they attract. Our clubs offer contracts as just


one of the options available: if people want to make the commitment to join for a year, they can enjoy the discounts of bulk buying, either by paying upfront or monthly. However, they can also be contract-free. It’s important to give people choice. A good business shouldn’t need to lock people in: it gives


a negative view of the industry. Health clubs offer a great product, so there’s no need to force people to stay. A good retention strategy, with excellent service, is far more powerful. In terms of having contracts as a safety net for cashflow


and a basis for bank lending, it looks very negative to say our members stay for 12 months because they’re locked in. This suggests they would leave if not. If you can demonstrate good retention without contracts, that’s far more compelling as a business plan and also attractive to prospective members.


” august 2012 © cybertrek 2012


kevin yates leisure connection • head of marketing and retention


“I


don’t think it’s time to scrap contracts, but operators certainly


need to offer choice. Some people like the discipline a contract instills, both from a physical activity point of view and also financial: allowing them to plan their finances. Others prefer the flexibility of pay as you go. More people now are using a variety


of different facilities, services and ways of working out: running, cycling to work or walking the dog, with the occasional swim or gym workout. So in today’s fiercely competitive market, in which the consumer has choice, we need to react and not remain rigid. The model Leisure Connection applies does just that: users can sign up for an annual contract; a more flexible monthly contract; swimming-only contract; or no contract at all, whereby they just pay and play. We’ve seen a great deal of success with this model. Retention is higher than it ever has been and like-for-like sales are up across the board. We operate in a service-led industry: we need to monitor


trends, listen to what our members want and then adjust our service and business model accordingly. Operators that understand this will be the winners.


” Read Health Club Management online at healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital 31


CANDYBOX IMAGES / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90