OFF TRACK SPOKES Of bike booms and bike paths
Carlton Reid looks back at the history of cycle infrastructure provision in the UK and wonders whether the Get Britain Cycling inquiry will lead to action
APPARENTLY – but only if you ignore the dire summer of las year – we’re in the middle of a bike boom. No doubt the report for the ‘Get Britain Cycling’ parliamentary inquiry will mention this boom (it ought to, I submitted the stats…) and the cyclists of this sceptre’d isle will be lavished with bicycle infrastructure to keep the boom going. Sadly, politics doesn’t work like that. Or, at least not for
cyclists. Between the years of 1928 and 1938 the number of cyclists in the UK doubled from 5,343,000 to 10,123,000. Now, *that* was a boom. What did the UK Government do for cyclists during that boom? Diddly squat, unless you count 95 miles of crap cycle lanes beside the newly-minted trunk roads of the day. In the 1950s there was another boom: a petrol-powered one. Billions got spent on motorists. Motorists – despite still being a minority on the roads – were well used to being feather-bedded. In the 1930s the motor industry had been especially cosseted because it was expected that car production would be shifted to military vehicle production; bicycle factories, such as the Raleigh plant, were also converted for armaments production but Sturmey Archer gears couldn’t power tanks. H.R. Watling, director of the British Cycle and Motor- cycle Manufacturers and Traders Union, told a parliamentary committee in 1938 that the UK made two million bicycles each year and that there were 15 million bicycles in use. (This trade organisation later split in two, although shared the same building in Coventry; the bicycle half of the organisation is now what is known as the Bicycle Association). The peers on the parliamentary committee asked
Watling for his views on ‘cycle tracks’, i.e. bike paths. “I have no objections to the principle of cycle tracks.
We have every objection to the cycle track as at present produced…the provision of a cycle track is, at best, a palliative…The cycle track to-day is of very little value because it is poorly constructed; there is only a small mileage of it, and furthermore, although it is provided for the cyclist yet the track is actually used by various other
people, such as perambulators, pedestrians and the like. In other words the cycle track to-day is not sufficiently inviting or sufficiently well constructed to induce the cyclist to use it.” He could have been speaking at the current inquiry, not a lot has changed. So, today, what *will* Get Britain Cycling? Presumed liability won’t Get Britain Cycling. Cycle
training won’t Get Britain Cycling. Separated cycle tracks won’t Get Britain Cycling. Subjective safety won’t Get Britain Cycling. Health messages won’t Get Britain Cycling. Better cycle security won’t Get Britain Cycling. Selling more bikes won’t Get Britain Cycling. ‘Go Dutch’ campaigns won’t Get Britain Cycling. 20mph zones won’t Get Britain Cycling. Taming cars won’t Get Britain Cycling. High-level political support for cycling won’t Get Britain Cycling. Millions more cash for cycling won’t Get Britain Cycling either. That is, not on their own. It’s a mix of all of the above,
and more. Much more. There’s no simple solution. It’s not just about infrastructure. If it were, Stevenage would be a hot-bed of cycling in the UK. It’s not just about looking at what’s been done in New York, Groningen, Seville, Copenhagen and Chicago. We need to learn from those cities, for sure, but there’s no one-size-fits-all template that works for all cities. And cycling isn’t just about cities. We also need to tame the car in the countryside, too. None of this will be easy, we’re up against more than 100 years of planning for the car. And, let’s face it, the majority of people – including lots who read this magazine – are glad there’s been this 100 years of planning for the car. People may not be happy to be stuck in their cars but even when given a gold-plated alternative, they may not use it. Inertia is like that. I gave evidence to ‘Get Britain Cycling’. The evidence I
gave has been said, by others, many times before. The evidence others gave has been said many times before. Really, there’s nothing new under the sun. Thing is, words are easy to say, it’s action that counts. Finally, will we get this action?
EDITORIAL: 01992 535646 | ADVERTISING: 01992 535647 | FAX: 01992 535648 Finance Director: Hilary Cole
Executive Editor: Carlton Reid
Carlton.Reid@
intentmedia.co.uk
Editor: Jonathon Harker
Jonathon.Harker@intentmedia.co.uk
Deputy Editor: Mark Sutton
Mark.Sutton@
intentmedia.co.uk
Sales Manager: Carly Bailey
Carly.Bailey@
intentmedia.co.uk
Sales Executive: Jake Adams
Jake.Adams@
intentmedia.co.uk
Design: Dan Bennett
Dan.Bennett@
intentmedia.co.uk
Production Assistant: Alice Sanz
Alice.Sanz@
intentmedia.co.uk
Managing Editor: Lisa Carter
Lisa.Carter@
intentmedia.co.uk
Publisher/MD: Stuart Dinsey
Stuart.Dinsey@intentmedia.co.uk
Marketing & Circulation: Lindsay Banham
Lindsay.Banham@
intentmedia.co.uk
LATEST NEWS STRAIGHT TO YOUR MOBILE | BOOKMARK US:
MOBILE.BIKEBIZ.COM 86 BIKEBIZ FEBRUARY
Editorial Saxon House, 6A, St. Andrew Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire. SG14 1JA
BikeBiz is mailed FOC to 4,000+ trade addresses every month ISSN 1476-1505
SUBSCRIPTIONS UK: £50 Europe: £60 Rest of World: £90
BikeBiz is published 12 times a year by Intent Media – Saxon House, 6a St. Andrew Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire SG14 1JA
Intent Media Subscriptions Department PO Box 35, Robertsbridge, TN32 5WN Tel: 01580 883848, Fax: 01580 883849
If you or one of your colleagues would like to request a subscription to BikeBiz, please email
bike.subscriptions@
c-cms.com or call 01580 883848. Please note that this is a controlled circulation title and subscription criteria will be strictly adhered to.
Intent Media is a member of the Audit Bureau of Circulation and the Periodical
Publishers Association
© Intent Media 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. The contents of BikeBiz are subject to reproduction in information storage and retrieval systems. Printed by The Manson Group, AL3 6PZ
Wondering what the Twitterati have been up to this month? Look no further...
Is it too soon to start provision on the HS2 trains?
complaining about lack of bike @Doctor Hutch
[Michael Hutchinson, journalist]
You don't see many fat men on a bicycle! #getBritainCycling
just one of many ways to tackle #obesity @drwollastonmp [Sarah Wollaston, MP]
Yesterday Obama became the first President to walk down a
bike lane on inauguration day @washingtonian
[Washington DC magazine]
Cycling in Japan is less about getting fit and more
about getting your groceries. @tokyobybike
Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was just
two tired. @malki
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88