OFF TRACK | SPOKESMAN SPOKES UCI tech bods are winning me over
Carlton Reid has had many runs in with the UCI over the years but – shock, horror – he’s warming to the Swiss organisation and it’s all because of the infamous stickering programme...
I NEVER thought I’d say this but I think the UCI is doing a good job. In many respects it’s still a micro-managing busy body with its governing org nose in places governing org noses need not be, but on the technical side – once the UCI’s weakest link – it is now much more responsive and, dare I say it, adaptable. The bicycle industry is keenly focused on the rules and
regulations created by the UCI. The organisation’s dictats, done wrong, can have huge financial implications for manufacturers. Amazingly, the organisation did not have an engineer on staff until the appointment of Julien Carron in october 2010. He’s the UCI’s technological coordinator and is an expert on carbon composites. Crucially, he talks the same tech language as the engineers at bicycle companies. Carron may have been with the UCI since 2010, but he only really started to become visible in 2011, with the creation of the UCI’s homologation programme – the approvals process for certifying frames and forks prior to mass manufacture. The approvals programme kicked up a lot of stink in
2011, with manufacturers large and small (but mostly small) complaining about the costs of the process. However, with the approvals process now in full swing, manufacturers’ fears about spiralling costs have not materialised. The costs of the programme are a lot less than the losses that would accrue if products already in the shops had to be withdrawn following a UCI decision at a race, for example. Carron is proving to be a key hire, somebody bike companies can go to with concerns, and get them answered by an expert. The all-important stickers – i.e. frame decals – certify
that frames and forks are compliant with the UCI’s technical guidelines. The complex and open-to-
interpretation rules on the weights and diameters and shapes of bicycle frames were first codified in the 1996 Lugano Charter, with technical regulations spelling out the charter’s concepts completed by 2000. These rules have been policed poorly over the years with some UCI commissaires banning certain bikes in some races, and other commissaires allowing the same bikes in other races. Manufacturers have produced costly frame and component innovations only for the UCI to forbid them. To prevent such on-the-starting-line rule confusion, the UCI consulted a select group of bicycle manufacturers to create the homologation programme. The programme’s introduction
was handled badly, with the UCI underestimating the number of players in the global bike industry, which meant the costs of the programme wre more expensive than they needed to be. “Our original study was based on getting frames from 20 manufacturers,” said Carron. When the homologation process
went public, many more manufacturers
said they would require approvals, too. “We made the calculation with the wrong number,” admitted Carron. “We needed to add many more manufacturers, so we corrected the numbers, and the costs came down.” The UCI’s approvals programme now consists of 71
manufacturers with a total of 119 different models approved, from Argon’s E-118 to Wilier’s Twin Foil, via Ridley’s Noah and Trek’s Madone. Carron, formerly of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, works with another engineer at the UCI HQ in Switzerland. Where before tech queries went into the abyss, now there’s an intelligent and knowledgable answer in reply. Carron is always available at the end of a phone line, and promptly answers his emails. The UCI’s tech dictats are still loopy, at times, but at least we now have somebody sensible to talk to about it.
EDITORIAL: 01992 535646 | ADVERTISING: 01992 535647 | FAX: 01992 535648 Finance Director: Hilary Cole
Executive Editor: Carlton Reid
Carlton.Reid@
intentmedia.co.uk
Editor: Jonathon Harker
Jonathon.Harker@intentmedia.co.uk
Deputy Editor: Mark Sutton
Mark.Sutton@
intentmedia.co.uk
Sales Manager: Carly Bailey
Carly.Bailey@
intentmedia.co.uk
Account Manager: Jennie Lane
Jennie.Lane@
intentmedia.co.uk
Production Executive: Kelly Jones
Kelly.Jones@
intentmedia.co.uk
Design: Dan Bennett
Dan.Bennett@
intentmedia.co.uk
Managing Editor: Lisa Carter
Lisa.Carter@
intentmedia.co.uk
Publisher/MD: Stuart Dinsey
Stuart.Dinsey@intentmedia.co.uk
Marketing & Circulation: Lindsay Banham
Lindsay.Banham@
intentmedia.co.uk
LATEST NEWS STRAIGHT TO YOUR MOBILE | BOOKMARK US:
MOBILE.BIKEBIZ.COM 94 BIKEBIZ JULY
Editorial Saxon House, 6A, St. Andrew Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire. SG14 1JA
BikeBiz is mailed FOC to 4,000+ trade addresses every month ISSN 1476-1505
Wondering what the Twitterati have been up to this month? Look no further...
Looking forward to seeing what issue 1 of @unchainedmag is
like, a Scottish cycling mag, they have real hills up there!
@TennOutdoors
Some very important samples arrived this morning, I could tell
you more, but I would have to kill you.
@PolarisBikewear
Phew! Just booked in over $250,000 of Shimano and over
€150,000 of Campag. The warehouse is rammed so get your orders in now! Team Ribble.
@RibbleCycles
OK, hands up who had 3 days in the 'time until Lance
threatens legal action' pool? @Velocentric
Sodium loss is the most significant electrolyte
lost in sweat. @ScienceInSport
SUBSCRIPTIONS UK: £50 Europe: £60 Rest of World: £90
BikeBiz is published 12 times a year by Intent Media – Saxon House, 6a St. Andrew Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire SG14 1JA
Intent Media Subscriptions Department PO Box 35, Robertsbridge, TN32 5WN Tel: 01580 883848, Fax: 01580 883849
If you or one of your colleagues would like to request a subscription to BikeBiz, please email
bike.subscriptions@
c-cms.com or call 01580 883848. Please note that this is a controlled circulation title and subscription criteria will be strictly adhered to.
Intent Media is a member of the Audit Bureau of Circulation and the Periodical
Publishers Association
© Intent Media 2012 No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without prior permission of the copyright owners. Printed by The Manson Group, AL3 6PZ.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96