SiC transistors industry
switching energies can have on a typical system. Two different topologies have been investigated, one boost and one inverter. Both are widely used in photovoltaic inverter designs. In such an inverter it is typical for the voltage from the solar panels to be initially increased by the boost stage (see figure 4). This boost voltage is then fed to the DC bus of the inverter stage (see figure 5), which causes a sinusoidal AC current flow through the output filters and into the network.
The details of our simulations are that a 8 kW boost converter stage was fed with 400 V and this voltage was increased up to 800 V. Different switches and diodes were compared at 16 kHz and 64 kHz, under the same cooling conditions. For the inverter a DC link voltage of 800 V was used, and a regular 230 V AC network connection on the output was used.
Figure 5. A DC input is transformed into a sinusoidal AC output with this typical inverter circuit. Both a SiC solution with BJTs and a silicon solution with IGBTs were simulated
voltage offset at zero current in the IGBT. Another strength of our SiC bipolar transistor is that it does not go into the ‘hard’ saturated state – previous generations of silicon bipolar transistors were notorious for this behavior. This makes the SiC BJT switch as a unipolar device, without the need for special precautions such as baker clamps. Thanks to the small die size and lack of parasitic components, they can operate at high frequencies with negligible turn off delays and no current tail at turn off.
Switching times below 20 ns are possible for a 800 V and 6 A SiC BJT. For the 50 A device the switching time is longer. That’s because the current rise and fall time is governed by the mutual stray inductance in the emitter path, and switching a higher current takes longer.
The turn on and turn off waveforms for our 50 A SiC BJT are very fast: turn on from 800 V to 50 A takes 60 ns, and turn off is even faster, requiring just 30 ns (see Figure 2).
Switching energies can be determined by integrating the product of voltage over and current through the device during the transitions. We have compared electrical losses with those from the datasheet for the IGBT. The difference is huge: the total SiC BJT switch energy (turn on plus turn off) is only 28 percent of that for the IGBT switch energy at 50 A and 800 V (see Figure 3). We have carried out higher-level system simulations to reveal the impact that the lower conduction loss and
Figure 6. The results from the electro-thermal simulations by engineers at Fairchild reveal the superiority of SiC BJTs in the boost stage. Losses are plotted versus the output current for the 8 kW boost converter in figure 4. It can be seen that the gain in efficiency using SiC compared to silicon is gets larger and larger as the load current is decreased (part load)
June 2011
www.compoundsemiconductor.net 23
For the 8 kW inverter stage the maximum output current amplitude was set to 50 A (33 A RMS). The same alternations of semiconductors and switching frequency were made, and the cooling conditions were throughout these alternations kept the same in this case as well. The results of our simulations are presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7.
These simulations not only highlight the lower conduction losses of the SiC BJT compared to the IGBT, but also
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207