34 Economic Trends by José I. Duarte
Contributions to GDP:
TABLE 1 - Main sectors (top 4) cumulative share of GDP Main sectors
MFG Trade Banking Real Estate Bus Serv Gambling It is an obvious fact, and it is often
80
stated, that the economy of Macau
is mainly driven by gaming. Some
70
people worry about this almost
mono-dependence. It is therefore
60
interesting to try to evaluate how
concentrated the local economy
50
is and to grasp how it has been
changing over the last few years.
40
TaBlE 1
Using a common indicator to analyze
the concentration of markets,
30
adapted here to the shares of the
various sectors in the GDP, some
20
features are readily apparent (Table
1). Note that the combined share
10
of the top 4 sectors in every year
gaming rose notably if compared
0
with 1999 – the lowest point –
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 but is not much above the values
for the mid-90’s.
TaBlE 2
But, gambling, the undisputed leader
of the pack, is becoming ever more
so. In just over a decade, its share
rose by more than 15% to more than
TABLE 2 - Main growth drivers differential growth
half of GDP. That increase alone is
bigger than any other sector. as a
Mfg Util Const Trade Transport Fin Game Adm result, Table 2 shows a striking effect.
The ratio between the gambling
70 sector and the three next top sectors
has risen wildly, from values below
60
1.5 in the last part of the previous
decade, to values over 2.5 and, at
50 times, closer to 3.5, in recent years.
The economy is certainly becoming
40
more polarized around that sector.
TaBlE 3
30
Table 3 shows, however, that other
sectors have at times shown great
20
dynamism. If we calculate the
10
differences between average growth
rate and the rates of the various
0
sectors, we see that the picture is
more diverse (Table 3). at different
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
times other sectors have grown
significantly above the average
without any clear pattern occurring
in the period. (Note that the boom
in construction in recent years was
TABLE 3 - Main sectors relative size ratio
so spectacular that if the value for
1995 was shown on the table, all the
other series would be so compressed
as to be undistinguishable). But, of
3.5
course, even when it grows below
the average, its contribution to the
absolute growth of the economy
3
dwarfs that of much smaller sectors
with higher growth rates. Note
that sector was, in this sense, an
2.5
alternative driver of the economy in
the timeframe shown.
2
1.5
1
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
March 2010
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140