search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REGULATORY BREXIT REVIEW


BREXIT SIX MONTHS ON


D


espite having officially left the European Union 18 months ago, it is only in the past six that the true effects


of the UK’s withdrawal have been felt. Indeed, once the transition period ended, it became clear that a large part of the cosmetics and personal care industry in both the UK and EU was ill prepared for the post-Brexit regulatory requirements. You might question why these brands and manufacturers did not take steps to get ready. After all, following the emphatic vote to ‘get Brexit done’ in the December 2019 General Election, the UK’s exit seemed assured. However, the negotiations and transition period were very uncertain throughout, and despite the


44 June 2021


Six months after the transition period expired, Alex Fotheringham reflects on the regulatory changes and the issues that have arisen


as a result of the UK’s exit from the European Union Government announcing plans and timelines, many remained unconvinced that anything would actually happen. Thankfully, there were no surprises in the implementation of the changes and in fact, everything that did change was known well in advance (at least a year). This provided ample time to prepare and those who did so have benefitted over the past six months.


REGULATORY CHANGES Responsible Person (RP) One of the biggest post-Brexit changes for the beauty and personal care industry relates to the Responsible Person (RP). Products sold in the UK and the EU are now subject to two different RP requirements: EU and UK RP.


From 1 January 2021, all UK-based RPs became invalid in the EU. This has left businesses that did not arrange a legitimate alternative in time in a precarious position, with their EU importers taking on the role. This means the importer has the associated liabilities and can now request significant amounts of, potentially confidential, data to undertake its duties. The RP is responsible for ensuring the product is safe for use and must be able to discuss technical and safety issues with the relevant Competent Authority. This requires access to potentially sensitive information. Worryingly, importers are often not even aware of their newly appointed responsibilities until they are inspected


cosmeticsbusiness.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64