This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
needed in the London Clay in the nearshore zone (See Chapter 7 Marine Geology, Oceanography and Physical Processes Impact 7.6.1.8). However, these effects would be highly localised and temporary in duration. The trenching into London Clay would likely result in clumps of material to be displaced and back-filled, rather than the material breaking down into its constituent silt and clay particles. It is therefore unlikely that significant changes in suspended sediment concentration would occur during these works. The back-filling of the trench would result in no noticeable change in coastal morphology after completion of the offshore cable installation at the landfall location and therefore the magnitude of the impact would be low.


202. The impact of increased suspended sediment and smothering would only be observed in the lower shore environment. The lower shore is described as ‘littoral coarse sediment’ (A2.1) using the EUNIS codes and LS.LCS.Sh.Bar.Sh (Barren littoral shingle) using the MNCR scheme. This habitat is very common along North Sea coastlines and due to the barren nature the ecology which exists, this biotope is not considered sensitive to increased suspended sediment or smothering. Furthermore, it is considered likely that the environment at the landfall location would regularly receive greatly increased levels of suspended sediment and smothering through natural events including storms and so the existing environment would be well adapted to such events.


203. The sensitivity of the receptors to the impact of increased suspended sediment and smothering to species and habitats present at the landfall would be negligible. With the negligible sensitivity and low magnitude of effect the impact is considered to be of negligible significance at the landfall.


10.6.1.2.3 Receptors Across Both Offshore Cable Corridor and the East Anglia THREE site 204. S. spinulosa thrives in conditions of elevated turbidity, which it uses to build the tubes within which it lives. Reefs are tolerant of short-term smothering but in the long-term sediment deposition may result in reduced growth and impaired feeding ability (OSPAR 2010). However, a study carried out by Last et al. (2011) found that S. spinulosa reef is tolerant of burial for up to 32 days and continues to build tubes while buried. Further evidence compiled by Marine Aggregate Levy Sustainability Fund (MALSF) found that there were no adverse effect due to increased suspended sediment to S. spinulosa reefs found within close proximity to active aggregate dredging sites (Pearce et al. 2011b).


205. These results indicate that increased suspended sediment and smothering would not have a detrimental impact on S. spinulosa reef and as a result a low magnitude of sensitivity is assigned. With the embedded mitigation designed to avoid interaction


Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014


East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm


Chapter 1 Introduction Page 68


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104