This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Table 10.2.Worst Case Assumptions Impact Construction


Impact 1: Temporary physical disturbance


The maximum area of disturbance during construction would be approximately 34.86km2 across the East Anglia THREE site and offshore cable corridor based on the following:


1. Sea bed disturbance for 60m gravity base foundations and scour protection calculated as 25,500m2 per foundation (see Chapter 7 Marine Geology, Oceanography and physical processes Table 7.4). Therefore for 106 foundations (see Rationale column) the maximum area of disturbance would be 2.68km2.


2. Sea bed disturbance for up to two meteorological masts and scour protection each 2,830m2 totalling a 0.01km2 area.


3. Jack up barge sea bed footprint for 180 foundations (based on a jack up barge footprint of 1,200m2and three movements per foundation) the maximum disturbance would be 0.65km2


4. Installation of up to 550km inter-array cables and 195km HVAC export cables between collector and converter stations. Therefore the maximum disturbed area (with worst case trench width of 10m and 5m spoil width either side of that) of 14.9km2.


Total maximumfootprint during construction within the East Anglia THREE site would therefore be 18.26.km2 (5.99% of the East Anglia THREE site).


5. Installation of up to 620km of HVDC export cable (with worst case width of 10m wide trench and a 5m spoil width either side of trench) would result in a maximum disturbed area of 12.4km2


Total footprint during construction within the offshore cable corridor would therefore be 12.4km2. (1.48% of the offshore cable corridor)


The overall total footprint of the proposed East Anglia THREE project is 30.66km2 (2.68% of the proposed East Anglia THREE project).


Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014


East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm


The largest wind turbines (12MW) would be installed on 60m diameter gravity base foundations and therefore the worst case would be 100 wind turbine foundations with their associated scour protection (a larger number (172) of the smaller (40m diameter) gravity base foundations and associated scour protection results in a smaller area of disturbance).


If scour protection is applied it is likely to be in the form of rock, concrete mattresses, sand-filled geotextile bags, or similar.


It has been assumed that the worst case for up to five foundations for converter and collector stations, and one accommodation platform would result in a similar amount of sea bed preparation as that for a wind turbine foundation.


Up to two meteorological masts may be installed using gravity base foundations.


Much of this calculated area would be only temporarily disturbed (i.e. anything related to cable installation). It is anticipated that a small proportion of it (the physical footprint of the proposed project) would represent permanent habitat loss. Operation Impact 1 assesses the impact of permanent habitat loss. An overlap would occur where there is a temporary physical disturbance (for example with sea bed preparation) with an area which then suffers permanent habitat loss through infrastructure being placed on that location. By assessing the two impacts (Construction


Chapter 10 Benthic Ecology Page 9


Key design parameters forming the worst case scenario Rationale


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104