This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
34 | 35


Setting the Scene


Encourage a mindset according to the age-appropriate blend of ‘deliberate practice’ (Characteristics: High and sustained physical and mental effort, intention to improve, correction of errors and work-like).


Although the session has a primary attacking (control) emphasis, the principles of out of possession (organise) and transition (react) should remain a focus for relevant and meaningful practice to be achieved.


Areas are smaller than usual to speed up the decision-making process to levels that could be associated with play in the attacking half and in and around the attacking third - for the purpose of preparing players to be able to cope with little time and space.


Conditions Game 1: For width and depth In possession, there must always be a minimum of 2 players in each flank area, a minimum of 4 players in the central area (at least 1 high up, at least 1 deep with at least 1 holding mf player)


Defending team – No conditions


Game 2: Midfield overload In possession only 1 player needs to be in each flank area


Main Theme: Control of the game in attack The coach should help the players prepare for being in and out of possession as well as the transitional stage.


In possession In preparation for when possession is regained, players on both teams should consider whether to play over (units or the team), around (down the sides of the opposition) or through (in between and through units of the opposition) with the following factors in mind:-


Personal strengths Positioning Strengths and weaknesses of opposition units/pillars Positioning, strengths, weaknesses of individuals/units/pillars Potential connections of/with teammates Score of the game State of the game


Out of Possession - organise In preparation for when possession is lost, players on both teams are asked to consider very carefully how best they might defend (organise) as a group.


Transition - react In preparation for regaining or losing possession, players on both teams are asked to consider very carefully how best they might take ‘control’ or ‘recover’ as a group.


Additional information Teams also may be given the opportunity to discuss strengths and weaknesses prior to or after games with a coach listening in and prompting/questioning if necessary. This approach encourages a ‘Community of Practice’ (Lave & Wenger, 1998)


Coach may use bandwidth and summary feedback and question and answer techniques.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88