integrated fare payment methods, and improved information. However, such a system is only possible if pub- lic sector entities make a concerted effort to ensure that collaboration with private mobility provider results in services that work for people of all ages, all incomes and all mobility needs. In the context of this complex the following aspects are addressed in particular: • The permanently growing potential for partnerships and collaboration
• Keeping the tech-enabled inno- vations fair and accessible
Figure 4: Lifestyle changes since starting to use shared modes, all respondents (based on [1]
shared modes they use most often, followed by bike-sharing (22 per cent). The frequent use of shared modes
is effecting a significant lifestyle change (figure 4).
2. Shared modes complement pub- lic transit, enhancing urban mobility. Ride-sourcing services are most fre- quently used for social trips between 10pm and 4am, times when public transit runs infrequently or is not available. Shared modes substitute more for automobile trips than pub- lic transit trips. The research conducted for the
study suggests that, instead of com- peting for the same riders, public transit and Ride-sourcing comple- ment one another by serving dif- ferent trip types. Ride-sourcing is mainly used for trip purposes like recreation and social and during time periods where only few or even no public transit is available. Only relatively few people use ride-sourc- ing for commuting. And those doing that do it only occasionally.
3. Shared modes will continue to grow in significance, and public enti- ties should identify opportunities to
75 )
engage with them to ensure that ben- efits are widely and equitably shared. Public transit agencies should seize opportunities to improve urban mobility for all users through collab- oration and public-private partner- ships, including greater integration of service, information and payment methods. It is explicitly emphasized that eve-
ryone can benefit from a transport system that provides more mobility options through seamless transfers,
)
• Paying attention of the equity implications of fare and service integration
• Public transit is the mode of choice for every income level
• Lower income households have much to gain from wider avail- ability of shared use modes
In this context the transport sector and market-overlapping paying-, information- and management-sys- tems play a key role – in particular based on electronic ticketing7
. To
date full advantage of the potential of e-ticketing has not been taken. This is in particular true for the transit sector
Figure 5: Household and financial changes since starting to use shared modes, all respondents (based on [1]
Social and Economic Impacts of Transport
PUBLIC TRANSIT, SHARED MOBILITY
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92