This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Fig. 5: Only a few start-ups will survive the new mobility race


pooling their IT-resources. Fig.5 Additional information about GBD


Green Business Development (GBD) GmbH is one of the leading consultancies in the area of green business development in Germany. With our expertise, we help corporations, start-ups, investors and public authorities build up innovation and growth at the intersection of the green economy and the digital economy. New Mobility is one of our core competences. We offer our clients services that comprise research & strategy, business development, start-up monitoring, and market expansion advisory.


respective country, more than 120 different start-ups were named. The undecided position is also reflected when asked who will dominate the European new mobility mar- ket. 29 per cent of experts believe that European start-ups will have a decisive market advantage and will dominate, while only 14 per cent expect US. Start-ups to successfully set hold in the European market. The majority of experts, however, main- tain a neutral position (46 per cent -59 per cent) on this issue,


CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS • PTAs and local authorities will be facing a rapidly developing and extremely dynamic mobility mar- ket. Lots of start-ups with innova- tive mobility solutions and ideas are grasping new business oppor- tunities and are pushing them- selves between the ‘hardware’ of PTAs and their customers.


• Legislation plays a key role


in shaping the market of new mobility services. By enforc- ing restrictive legislation, pub- lic authorities will be able to defend current practices of pub- lic transport in cities for some time, however not in the long- run. New mobility concepts offer not only competition but also improved services and envi- ronmentally friendly solutions for citizens. Recognizing that there is a need to adjust current mobility legislation will enable authorities and PTAs to actively shape the development of the new mobility market, instead of merely reacting with individual solutions to disrupting changes.


• Appropriate reactions by PTAs can be twofold: PTAs can either develop mutually beneficial rela- tionships by ways of enhanced cooperation and joint ventures with start-ups or develop own regionally integrated ITS- solutions with various PTAs


• Successful start-ups are allo- cating large investments to marketing to unlock customer access. Their fruitful business models are based on optimiz- ing usability while using the expensive ‘hardware’ (buses, trains, subways, cars) of public authorities and private own- ers (peer-to-peer). PTAs can help to actively shape this rap- idly evolving market using their decisive advantage - the access to their customers. Looking at these developments, PTAs and authorities are forced to react, not to lose market shares in the area of intermodal mobility services when start-ups will be tapping into the PTAs’ existing customer base.


• While currently, most cities and regions are adapting individual, local solutions with low rates of transferability, investors and start-ups have recognized the need to generate new mobility services that follow a common international approach: one IT-solution for multiple regions and countries. The demand for Mobility as a Service (MaaS) solutions with an international scope that provide enhanced efficiency and maximum usa- bility for customers is rising. Initiatives such as Polis’ Traffic Efficiency and Mobility are therefore key to deepening and coordinating ITS-solutions on a European level.


FYI Egbert Huenewaldt is Managing Director of Green Business Development


huenewaldt@gbd.green greenbusinessdevelopment.de


59


Mobility, Multiodality and Traffic Efficiency


BERLIN


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92