This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
increasing digitalization and emerg- ing disruptive mobility services, a growing demand for innovative, inte- grated, and well-managed mobil- ity solutions is being met by various start-ups. These are trying to har- ness the momentum of new market opportunities and profitable growth. With a wide range of new start-ups surfacing offering fast-changing new mobility solutions, the concept of new mobility services has moved beyond merely being a hot-topic. As a conse- quence, the European new mobility market is becoming transparent.


T Fig.1


he mobility market is shifting from product-based to service- based modes of business. With


Currently, an important task for


authorities and public transport agencies (PTAs) is to grasp the rap- idly evolving market for new mobility services. Since PTAs are organized at a local level, in most cases, their new mobility services maintain a local individual focus with low rates of transferability. The Berlin-based consultancy


Green Business Development (GBD) conducted an independent expert survey with the aim to bring more transparency into the new mobil- ity market. GBD’s European new mobility survey 2016 is the first Europe-wide expert survey on the development of this extremely


dynamic market. More than 200 experts from eight countries par- ticipated in this study. Respondents included experts from nine business sectors: the automotive industry, start-ups, public transport agencies, accelerators and incubators, inves- tors, consultancies, governments and public sector, research institutes and universities. Mobility services are regarded as comprehensive solutions that integrate the users’ mobility ecosystems. In this study the term ‘new mobility’ includes vari- ous forms of new mobility services: car-sharing, ride-sharing, e-hailing, intermodal mobility services, park- ing services and logistics services.


Fig.1: Opinions regarding liberal mobility legislation / Fig.2: New mobility hotspots in Europe / Fig. 3: Cities vs. rural areas


Fig.2


Fig.3 57


Mobility, Multiodality and Traffic Efficiency


BERLIN


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92