This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
129 LEgAL CoRNER


By Nigel Wilkie, Associate Solicitor, Dartmouth Office When a Positive is a Negative


Y


ou would be forgiven for thinking that a promise given by a neighbouring


property to pay half the cost of repairing the fence between you was a good thing. Unfortunately it may be worthless. english property law allows obligations or


covenants to be imposed by one property owner on another in certain circumstances. these can be positive covenants or “doing” covenants requiring a neighbouring property to maintain, repair and insure for example, or they can be Restrictive Covenants or “do not do” covenants, for example prohibiting the use of the neighbouring property for any business use or building extensions without approval. By an odd quirk of english


property law, positive promises affecting freehold properties, unlike such promises in leases, are only enforceable between the people who originally made the promises and they are not binding on any subsequent owners. this can be a problem between neighbouring houses but is a major problem with freehold flats, as each flat is dependent upon the other flats being adequately maintained and repaired and especially insured. Although freehold flats are rare, and a modern development would almost certainly be leasehold, they do arise particularly with houses converted into flats before the 1980’s. If a flat in a building falls into disrepair, and


that each flat owner have buildings insurance. For this reason, it is nigh on impossible to obtain a mortgage to buy a freehold flat. there may be a possibility of arranging an indemnity insurance policy to cover your loss if such damage does occur but it is not readily available and is likely to be expensive. If a house has been divided into two or three


If only one


person does not co-operate the consequences, particularly in a block of flats, can be disastrous


freehold flats, it is often possible to arrange for the respective owners of the flats to enter into Deeds of Covenant in favour of each other. there is a disadvantage here in that those Deeds would have to be renewed between all the flat owners each and every time one of the flats are sold. A better solution would be for all of the flat owners to agree to convert the flats to leasehold and this is a question that can be raised by a potential buyer of a freehold flat.


However if the development is of more than say four flats it becomes


unlikely that all of them would agree at the same time to convert because of the cost each would incur and it is essential that all agree or the proposal does not work. Generally speaking the various owners of


Freehold properties, including Flat owners, do co-operate reasonably well with each other as it is in their own interest to do so. unfortunately if only one person does not co-operate the consequences, particularly in a block of flats, can be disastrous!


becomes structurally unsound, this is likely to affect all of the flats in the building but the other flats owners are not likely to have a right to make the defaulting flat owner maintain or repair his or her flat or rebuild it if it collapses, and might not even have a right to require


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148