This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
In the amendment, OSHA proposed that


employers be prohibited from requiring employees to submit to drug testing fol- lowing the report of a workplace injury (in- cluding post-accident testing). Post-acci- dent testing is a key component of effective drug-free workplaces. Employees who test positive for marijuana use have 55 percent more industrial accidents and 85 percent more injuries, according to the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS). In a recent study conducted by DATIA and the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), data showed that employers with high workers’ compensation incidence claims aſter accidents decreased by more than half (57 percent) aſter implementing a drug testing program. DATIA has sent all of its members the


full comments in the Oct. 23 edition of DATIA eNews. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding those.


Reminder from DOT to MROs Regarding Verifying an Employee’s Prescription As a reminder, when a donor provides a prescription for a non-negative laboratory test result, as the MRO, you are responsible for determining whether the medical expla- nation is legitimate. In your role as the “gatekeeper” in this


process, you must review and take all reasonable and necessary steps to verify the authenticity of all medical records the employee provides (see 49 CFR Section 40.141(b)). For example: • Call the pharmacy to verify the legiti- macy of the prescription; and


• Call the donor’s treating physician if you have suspicions or questions In accordance with 49 CFR Sections


40.137(c), 40.139(b), and 40.145(e), the donor has the burden of proof that a legitimate medical explanation exists. Te donor must present information meeting this burden at the time of the verification


www.datia.org


interview. You may extend the time avail- able for the donor to present the informa- tion for up to 5 days. If the donor fails to provide information you have requested (e.g., does not produce a prescription or does not facilitate the treating physician’s contact with you), you may proceed in making your determination. Any time you make the determination to


verify a laboratory positive result negative because of a legitimate medical explanation, you may have a responsibility to raise fitness- for-duty considerations in accordance with 49 CFR Section 40.137(e)(4) and 40.327. In raising these concerns, you are only authorized to provide information learned through your verification interview with the employee’s employer, a physician or health care provider responsible for determining the employee’s medical qualifications under a DOT agency’s safety regulations, a SAP evaluating the employee as part of the return to duty process, a DOT agency, or with the National Transportation Safety Board dur- ing the course of an accident investigation. DOT sent this reminder on Sept. 30,


2014. ❚ datia focus 39


The Nov. 4 election showed relatively small amounts of support for pro- marijuana initiatives.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64