This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
News


Who will put sport back on the school agenda?


James Mead, Head Groundsman at Rugby School, asks whether the Olympic legacy will ever be delivered without a change in policy


IT CAME, it triumphed and the whole country glorified in its wonder; the Olympic Games really did deliver. So, what next for our sporting nation?


The buzz word has always been ‘legacy’, but surely it must mean more than rebuilding another chunk of London? It must encompass the whole nation if we are going to put sport back on the agenda.


It will need a seismic change in Government policy to put back into place a thriving competitive state school sporting programme, for this is where the neglect of our youngsters sporting opportunities are most obvious.


There have been too many half-hearted tweaks by various political parties. This time, we need to think, plan and independently fund a long term strategy, whilst also taking away political infighting by implementing a non-political national sports body to oversee all aspects of sport in schools.


We have a very well developed template to observe, which is to be found in the private school system. In Beijing, 80% of medal winners and a quarter of the GB team for


London came from this sector, so a huge amount can be learnt, and then even bettered, when looking to put together a national strategy.


The fundamental difference for many years between state and private is that private schools have continued to back themselves with funding towards a wide breadth of sports facilities and, very important from our profession’s point of view, they have backed the employment of permanent groundstaff, which is in stark contrast to Government’s selling of playing fields and minimal grounds maintenance.


We already have academy schools in various guises, performing arts, science and even some called specialist sports schools - the one nearest to Rugby has some of the worst grounds for miles!


So, if there is to be an Olympic legacy, it must include a genuine programme of accessible state schools dedicated to delivering the very best sporting education, in association with the very best that our grounds industry can offer. Link the two together and then ALL of our youth will have a fighting chance of sporting success.


West Ham


preferred West Ham named as preferred bidders for Olympic Stadium


THE London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) ranked Premier League club West Ham United’s bid as the number one choice after a meeting in early December.


Other bids had been made by League One side Leyton Orient, UCFB College of Football Business and a consortium linked to Formula 1.


The £429m venue is not expected to fully reopen before August 2015.


LLDC chairman and London Mayor Boris Johnson said: “My position on the future of the stadium remains what it has always been; that we can secure a terrific future for this much loved and iconic venue with or without a football team playing there. It will, if it goes through, mean a football legacy for the stadium, but there is still a lot of negotiation to go on between the LLDC and West Ham United about the terms of the deal.”


In a statement, West Ham did not comment on the issue but said the LLDC’s decision “guarantees a true and lasting legacy for east London and the best possible outcome for the British taxpayer”, whilst Vice-chairman, Karren Brady, said the stadium could become a “multi- use destination of which east London and the nation as a whole can be proud”.


BTME is back


The BIGGA Turf Management Exhibition for its 24th year, at the Harrogate International Centre, 22-24 January 2013


 Over 150 exhibitors


showcasing the latest products


 Network


with over 7000 sports and turf professionals


 The annual must-attend event for golf greenkeepers


FOR FREE ENTRY TO BTME 2013 Vi www.btme.org.uk


sit and DECEMBER/JANUARY 2013 PC 7 20-23 January 2013


BIGGA Seminars & Workshops


CLICK REGISTER NOW


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140