This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FUTURE ENVIRONMENT AND STORMWATER | CHAPTER 12


City or a third party. The City can own and manage BMPs as part of its stormwater facilities and utility. Private parties can own the land with the City holding a util- ity easement and managing the BMPs. Cedar Falls should choose an approach that meets its traditions, needs, staff, and budget.


The TMDL for Dry Run Creek identifies a goal of <10% connected impervious sur- face (CIS). This goal is met easily in new developments with the proper BMPs, so the key is to plan and design with a 10% CIS threshold in mind. The idea behind reducing CIS is to increase residence time, which reduces runoff volume by extend- ing infiltration duration. Groundwater recharge increases stream base flow, reduc- es stream bounce, and dissipates velocities that cause bed and bank erosion. Also, both infiltration and vegetation capture sediment, thereby reducing loads further.


New development BMPs should be integrated with existing stormwater infrastruc- ture. The design must ensure that new BMPs and existing systems work effectively together, with minimal maintenance. Evaluation of stormwater management sys- tems for new developments should be performance-based, not prescriptive. Perfor- mance measures include total runoff volume from a development, discharge rate at storm sewer outfalls, and water quality thresholds for sediment, bacteria, and nu- trients. These performance criteria should be put in place for all new developments in order to have a sustainable stormwater management system which protects and improves the City’s streams and other downstream receiving waters (e.g., Cedar Riv- er). Headwater areas are especially important because stormwater BMPs in these locations benefit all downstream reaches.


EXISTING DEVELOPMENT


Redevelopment and infill projects present a unique opportunity to improve storm- water management in existing developed areas. The TMDL for Dry Run Creek iden- tifies a goal of <10% CIS. However, existing facilities and impervious surfaces in the City make it a challenge to achieve less than 10% CIS in the already-developed sub- watersheds of Dry Run Creek.


Redevelopment and infill projects often lend themselves to hybrid solutions. These encompass both naturalized elements of stormwater treatment trains and also more engineered components. A “Green Street” is an example of a hybrid solution that provides landscaping while managing runoff more effectively than conven- tional designs for a similar area. Green roofs, cisterns, and permeable pavements are other BMPs that can be applied in existing urban areas, dense suburban de- velopments, and many retrofit projects. Where there is enough room (e.g. - malls, corporate facilities, institutions, and in large parking lots), naturalized BMPs may consist of curb cuts that direct runoff to infiltration swales and basins, and even treatment wetlands. The most important thing in redevelopment and infill projects is to look for places to slow and hold stormwater runoff, thus promoting infiltration and evapotranspiration. This approach will gradually improve the quality of Dry Run Creek and other streams in Cedar Falls.


171


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201