This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FUTURE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK | CHAPTER 9


The neighborhood group has also recently compiled a set of recommended design guidelines to replace those currently included in the College Hill Overlay District. Again, appropriate design guidelines should be thoroughly investigated during the zoning ordinance redraft project. Design guidelines can address not only the ap- pearance of new structures, but also improvements to mitigate impacts on adja- cent single-family properties and zoning districts. In addition, the zoning discussion should include consideration of a new restricted medium-density zoning district for use in a transition zone where smaller townhouse attached development would be allowed but not typical apartment buildings. These possible approaches to devel-


opment regulations in the College Hill Neighborhood, and others, should be evalu- ated with the neighborhood group to establish a long-term transition zone.


In the interim, it is recommended that the Future Land Use Map of this comprehen- sive plan reflect the current zoning boundaries with respect to residential land use in the College Hill Neighborhood. A close up of the College Hill Neighborhood as depicted in the future land use map is shown in Figure 9.13.


THE COLLEGE HILL PARTNERSHIP


FUTURE LAND USE Figure 9.14 shows the future land use of Cedar Falls, which includes current land use and the proposed uses from the development concept outlined above. In light of Cedar Falls recent policy to prohibit new building lots in the 100 and 500 year flood- plains, undeveloped properties in the floodplain and properties eligible for flood buy-outs are shown as greenway. Developed properties in the floodplain that are not eligible for buyout are marked as floodplain (not greenway). Existing developed properties marked as greenway are to transition slowly through natural turnover.


The transition of floodplain areas to greenway will lessen the risk of property dam- age, and improve public safety by keeping residences out of harm’s way. This strat- egy helps fulfill several important goals of the Cedar Falls Hazard Mitigation Plan (2009), including: to remove structures and people in danger of being flooded and to enforce the floodplain ordinance. As indicated earlier, the system of greenway will also serve an important function for natural stormwater drainage, which also mitigates flood risk. Table 9.1 defines the characteristics of each of the land use cat- egories specified in the Development Concept and Future Land Use Plan.


LAND USE COMPATIBILITY


Some of the most difficult issues in plan implementation arise when more intensive uses are proposed adjacent to less intensive uses. Table 9.2 is a land use compat- ibility guide that indicates which land uses are typically compatible, and which land use combinations may create significant conflict. This chart can be used as a starting point to assess the relationship between land uses and provide a basis for develop- ment proposal review. However, individual proposals will need to be assessed on a case by case basis to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses.


145


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201