This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
14


A lighter alternative


The replacement of metal components with engineered plastics offers huge advantages, especially in the aircraft industry


Replacement for a stainless steel surgical device


Candidate to replace a forged aluminium luggage rack bracket


Moulded aircraft fairing Replacement for multipart steel bearing cage


With oil prices driving up fuel costs, weight- savings are on everyone’s mind. Besides significant weight reduction, plastics offer additional key features: corrosion resistance, potential for reduced part count, moulded-in rather than machined features, greater design freedom, moulded in colours and textures, and a naturally electrically insulating material. Plastics also free manufacturers from the long lead times that have plagued some aircraft materials, like titanium. The questions have been, “Is it practical? Is it safe? Is it cost-effective?” Vaupell’s many experiences with successful metal replacement programs demonstrate that the answer is often “Yes”. A growing number of plastics approach or even exceed the stiffness and strength of aircraft aluminium, magnesium and even titanium. Vaupell has helped with a number of successful metal replacement projects, from medical products like hip and bone repair components, to a relatively high-volume glass- filled nylon product that replaces the previously steel bearing cage for railway roller bearings. And, of course, innovative designers in the aircraft industry have come to us with many candidates from metal replacement. Some of these plastic parts are flying today, including PEEK brackets for ESD detectors in fuel tanks, glass-filled nylon cable brackets, fairings, clips, and a wide variety of other applications with structural and cosmetic requirements, using a full range of aerospace engineering materials, from PEIs to polysulfones, and various glass- filled polyamides. One recent example is the conversion of a


previously die-cast aluminium drain mast to moulded PEEK, with the advantage of significant weight reduction, elimination of corrosion issues


and much extended tooling life. Because of significant potential stresses on the part, the mounting holes are drilled after moulding, to eliminate the problem of potential weaknesses on the weld lines that would have been created by material flow around core pins in the mould. Besides the potential for fuel savings from


reduced weight, savings can be obtained on the parts themselves through elimination of painting or secondary coating, elimination of secondary machining operations, and the addition of moulded in graphics. Depending on the application, several metal parts can often be combined into one plastic part, eliminating welding and/or assembly.


The key to success is to work with moulding and material specialists to ensure that the part design and material selection are appropriate to the challenge. Some of the most exciting opportunities at present are in seating, cabin interiors, luggage rack systems, and cable and hydraulic routing.


A key aspect of the design challenge is to


ensure that the plastic parts are fully engineered for manufacturability. Moulded in stresses resulting from poor part design, inappropriately placed weld lines, thick/thin section transitions, and improper wall thicknesses are all issues that can dramatically effect the strength and utility of the part. It is important to partner with experienced plastics engineers and moulders to ensure that the plastic material is being used to maximum advantage. But with the appropriate engineering input, many metal components in aircraft today should be candidates for replacement with strong, corrosion resistant plastics, most of which are roughly half the weight of aluminium.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182