This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
railroad passengers and then only when the coach windows are clean enough to see


through. (This MBTA’s finances.)


I am modeling Rowley and Newbury- port on my HO scale B&M Eastern Route layout, and I wanted to include the Route 1-A bridge as a scene divider and photographic prop. There are a number of commercial arch and beam bridge kits available in HO scale. How- ever, duplicating the prototype’s skew was going to require at least some scratchbuilding.


The 1931 reinforced concrete beam bridge was added alongside the original concrete arch bridge. This view of the underside of both spans (above) shows the resulting odd appear- ance from below. The newer portion had steel plates applied over the track center line to protect the concrete from steam locomotive exhaust. The south side is shown below.


I visited Rowley to take measure- ments and photographs. Working alone, I used a 25-foot tape measure in lieu of a plumb bob to get the basic arch and beam bridge dimensions. A real plumb bob, a longer tape and a helper would have made it easier. I tacked prints of my pictures over the layout and considered how to proceed. My location could accommodate the bridge and its approach fills, but at 45 feet wide the prototype road was a sub- stantial highway. With the skew an un- compressed HO scale bridge would take up 17 inches of track, which is more than I had available. Experi- menting with HO vehicles and card- board mockups, I compromised on com- pressing the road to a 25 scale foot width. This is wide enough that the presence of vehicles doesn’t make it look like a country lane. It’s also wide enough to barely justify the two paral- lel bridge spans.


The skewed arch I started by building a “sub-road-


The template for the arch is shown next to the styrene cut for it. Because the length is less on the model, the arch looks higher. Even so, the height was reduced a little.


the south side of the arch they built a new bridge using reinforced concrete beams. Sets of supporting columns straddling the tracks carried the cen- ter span. The shorter approach spans were supported by abutments buried in the approach fills, avoiding con- struction of new wing retaining walls. In 2014,


the 1907/1931-vintage


bridge still carries Massachusetts Route 1-A over the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s Newbury- port commuter rail line, but very few drivers notice the mix of old and new. The concrete balustrade is arranged dif- ferently on the north and south sides, but the seam between the spans is in- visible. The history is only visible to


RAILROAD MODEL CRAFTSMAN


way” of ¹₂″ plywood for the highway from the backdrop to the fascia. I cut the strip an inch wider than the planned road and supported it on ris- ers against the underside of the main- line’s plywood sub-roadbed. This gave me a solid base on which to form the arch and assemble the bridge. Next, I made a template for the arch out of shirt cardboard. I got the basic dimensions by using an NMRA clear- ance gauge and developed the shape of the arch using a French curve and compass. Since my bridge is also on a curve, I had to make the crown of the arch flatter than the prototype’s to gain clearance. After I cut the template out, I cleaned up the edges.


I traced the template onto .020″ styrene sheet and cut out two arch sides. Using pins, clamps and wood blocks, I located the sides in their final positions on the plywood base. Then I formed another .020″ styrene sheet to make the inner surface of the arch, holding it against the sides with more pins and wood blocks. After checking clearances one more time, I filed a


47 varies with the


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100