This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Business profile


BAM Ritchies has been involved with high profile projects including Crossrail, Scotland’s Borders Rail Project and Hooley Cutting


I


mproving and expanding the rail network often involves ground engineering. On our crowded and busy islands, it can be difficult to deal with ground engineering aspects of the infrastructure while minimising the impact on network use, people and nearby structures. Earthworks frequently require ground


engineering but other circumstances do too. Electrification, now proceeding widely on schemes such as EGIP and Great Western, require foundation work and, at times, track lowering based on designs having an appreciation of ground conditions. Determining the nature of the ground involves investigations, often undertaken in awkward locations. As a leading ground investigation contractor, BAM Ritchies uses a wide variety of techniques on electrification and resignalling schemes, and on the surface sections of Crossrail. The company has also undertaken extensive investigation work for Scotland’s new Borders Rail Project.


Correcting the Hooley Cutting A team of BAM Ritchies engineers recently stabilised a key Surrey railway cutting hit by land slips, and the work has been recognised by two Institution of Civil Engineers awards. Victorian railway engineers knew


a thing or two about construction and a small slither of Surrey countryside encompasses all of that knowledge. This team has worked to ensure a 150-year-old railway cutting at Hooley maintains the performance levels those engineers first envisaged.


The village marks a pass into the North


Downs which is also the point that, in the 1840’s, two rival rail companies recognised would be perfect for running their London to Brighton lines. These two railway lines run in parallel and pass through deep cuttings separated by just a few metres of land that forms a central spine between them. Now known as the ‘Slow’ line and the


‘Fast’ or ‘Quarry’ line these cuttings have been plagued by slope failure over recent years - particularly that of the 30-metre deep Slow line, which has seen several trains derailed by land slips. To stabilise the Slow line cutting, a


October 2013 Page 117


team from BAM Ritchies and BAM Nuttall installed soil nails, reprofiled the central spine, installed concrete beam and grillage stabilisation and placed a concrete beam along the crest of one side of the cutting. BAM Ritchies contracts manager


Andrew O’Donovan described the procedure as ‘complicated even on the shallowest of cuttings’. The project team


worked above the live railway on a cutting that theoretically should be a 70 degree slope but is actually vertical in many places and very steep sided.


O’Donavan said: ‘The cliff-like fall of


the cutting isn’t the only reason it has been prone to failure in recent years. The lie of the land between the Forge Lane Bridge to the north and the tunnel which marks


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140