Politics
President’s Plan Divides the Nation
WITH DOUGLAS SCHOEN Unconventional Wisdom
Douglas Schoen is an author, political strategist, Fox News contributor, and former adviser to President Bill Clinton.
His latest book is Hopelessly Divided: The New Crisis in American Politics and What It Means for 2012 and Beyond.
T BY DOUGLAS SCHOEN
hings have clearly been going president Barack Obama’s way — he has been winning the political fight since being re-elected. But is he bringing us together as a nation?
His inaugural address was an elegant, eloquent, and compelling speech. It invoked the key message of equality — for women, minorities, the disabled, and gays. He put himself in the same category as Martin Luther King Jr. and President Abraham Lincoln. He argued that we are a nation that defends our people
and our values at home and abroad. That we will tackle climate change and see government reform. That said, while the tone was uplifting, the rhetoric was ideologically driven and potentially quite polarizing. Before the inaugural address, the president had two
big fiscal wins. He won the fight over taxes in the fiscal cliff negotiations, managing to get a deal that was totally imbalanced in the Democrats’ favor and offered only $1 in spending cuts for every $44 in tax increases. And with the decision to do a three-month extension on the debt ceiling, Republicans are on the defensive. But in these victories the president may be setting himself up for a great fall. It is becoming increasingly clear that the Republicans
have no strategy on the debt, deficit, taxes, or entitlement reform. They need an inclusive, pro-growth agenda and until they get one, the Democrats will continue to dominate negotiations. But President Obama is losing the long-term battle
that will be played out over the next four years, potentially hurting himself, the Democrats, and the country by continuing to employ the divisive approach he used throughout campaign season and the first few months of
34 NEWSMAX | MARCH 2013
his second term. Why do I say this? First, he is hurting himself because his legacy is based on inclusiveness, being a different kind of president and doing politics a different sort of way. His partisan approach since the election is antithetical to why he was elected in the first place.
I
n his inaugural address, he made the argument in favor of his progressive, collectivist approach to government. This raises serious doubts in the longer term for the
ability of the Democratic Party and the president to forge the kind of consensus America needs to move forward. We need compromise, and from this speech, it is far from clear that the president and his party are capable, or interested, in doing this. Second, he is hurting the Democrats because they
have to move to the center and take on spending and entitlements, neither of which he has encouraged. We saw how important this shift is in 2010, an off-year election, when that electorate was much more sensitive to spending and tax issues than in the previous presidential election. In turn, the president must be solicitous of real world
concerns to reform the debt, deficit, and entitlements and show he can be socially progressive and fiscally conservative as Bill Clinton was in negotiations in 1995 and 1996 with Newt Gingrich. Finally, the president is hurting the country because
he has failed to recognize that we are a nation at risk. As former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles and Sen. Alan Simpson have argued, we are facing unsustainable fiscal challenges. Our debt has recently reached over 100 percent of GDP. We have to rein in spending and need a balanced plan that also includes increased tax hikes. Despite setting up the Bowles-Simpson commission,
the president has rejected the plan and, further, not yet said what he plans to do to address fiscal challenges. As a number of people have said, and I agree, our
national security is inexorably linked to our fiscal health. Unless we are able to pull together as a nation with a
common purpose and a clear sense of fiscal discipline, ultimately the American people will lose. This will be Obama’s greatest failing, and although he
is racking up short-term wins, he seriously runs the risk of steering us through one of the more confused periods in American history if he doesn’t adjust his approach.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92