This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Rail Professional interview: Mark Hopwood


We’d used the 180s before, but they’re a bit schizophrenic


As First Great Western moves into the last year of its current franchise, its managing director tells Katie Silvester about the work still to be done


the operation Worst Late Western. The press was having a field day.


B


Rail stalwart Alison Forster initially headed up the franchise, but FirstGroup moved her to another part of the company, replacing with high flyer Andrew Haines. Haines had previously run South West Trains and was by then in charge of First’s rail division, but was tasked with taking over the day-to- day running of FGW until its performance was back up to an acceptable level. Haines had barely got his feet under the table when he left the job suddenly for health reasons.


Enter Mark Hopwood who had been running Londonlines, but was left with just the UK’s smallest franchise, C2C, when National Express lost other franchises in the area. Hopwood was invited to rejoin FirstGroup by Andrew Haines, having previously worked for First North Western – C2C, he admits, hadn’t been enough of a challenge for him. He began working alongside Haines as operations manager on FGW, then stepped up to the MD role when Haines left and quietly got on with the job of turning the company around. Slowly but surely the company’s performance began to recover and the damaging headlines stopped.


So how did he set about restoring passengers’ faith in First Great Western?


‘There was a very strong focus on resources in terms of having the right number of drivers, guards and rolling stock,’ says Hopwood. ‘We did a lot of driver and guard recruitment. We brought new rolling stock into the business and we put together quite a comprehensive performance recovery plan. We also looked at the timetable, the rolling stock and train crew diagrams and that led to an improvement


PAGE 12 SEPTEMBER 2012


efore Mark Hopwood took the helm, the First Great Western franchise had been having a rough time – overcrowding was terrible, staff were becoming demoralised and disenchanted passengers had renamed


in performance. And, if I’m honest, I think we improved it to a greater extent than people thought we could.’


As part of a £29m passenger benefit package negotiated with the DfT, which saw FirstGroup injecting extra cash into the franchise, additional Class 142s were acquired, as well as an extra HST set and some Class 180s were kept longer than planned. FGW’s problems had come about mainly because of unexpected growth in passenger numbers in the early years of the franchise. First had invested in extra rolling stock at the start of the franchise, but the growth in the amount of passengers commuting in and out of Paddington had used up all those extra seats. Historically, British Rail had run quite small trains in and out of Paddington, Hopwood explains, often just two or three cars long. ‘We looked around the UK at what options were available and identified four opportunities across the network. The first was to bring in some extra 150s and 153s for the west services, so the services around Bristol and the west of England gained some extra services. And for Paddington, there was a three-pronged approached. There were some HST buffet cars, which were off lease. We’ve had those completely stripped out and converted into standard class trailers. We’ve got those in traffic now and they look really good. Nobody would know that they were in an old buffet car. We also knew that East Coast had decided not to use the five 180s that it had on lease and that they were available. ‘We’d used the 180s before, but they’re a bit schizophrenic – customers love them as they have a really pleasant environment, but they are a bit unreliable. But we’ve had experience of maintaining them, so we put the 180s onto some of the commuter services into Reading and the Cotswolds line. We’ve moved the Turbos that they replaced and put them onto other lines. There were 150s, three-car sets, available so we’ve put them on the Reading to


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60