This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CONNECTING THE COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR COMMUNITY


June 2012 Volume 18 Number 4


Editor-in-Chief David Ridsdale


+44 (0)1923 690200


Editor Richard Stevenson PhD


richardstevenson@angelbc.co.uk +44 (0)1291 629640


News Editor Dr.Su Westwater


suwestwater@angelbc.co.uk


Director of SOLAR & IC Publishing Jackie Cannon


+44 (0)1923 690205


Account Managers Robin Halder


+44 (0)2476 718109 Shehzad Munshi


+44 (0)1923 690215


USA Representatives Brun Media Tom Brun


Tel: 724 539-2404 Janice Jenkins


Tel: 724-929-3550


Director of Logistics Sharon Cowley


+44 (0)1923 690200


Design & Production Manager Mitchell Gaynor


+44 (0)1923 690214


Circulation Director Jan Smoothy


+44 (0)1923 690200


Subscriptions Manager Debbie Higham


+44 (0)1923 690220


Chief Operating Officer Stephen Whitehurst stephen.whitehurst@angelbc.com +44 (0)2476 718970


Directors


Bill Dunlop Uprichard – CEO Stephen Whitehurst – COO Jan Smoothy – CFO Jackie Cannon, Scott Adams, Sharon Cowley, Sukhi Bhadal


Published by


Angel Business Communications Ltd, Hannay House, 39 Clarendon Road, Watford, Herts WD17 1JA, UK T: +44 (0)1923 690200 F: +44 (0)1923 690201


Angel Business Communications Ltd Unit 6, Bow Court, Fletchworth Gate, Burnsall Road,Coventry CV5 6SP T: +44 (0)2476 718 970 F: +44 (0)2476 718 971


Compound Semiconductor is published eight times a year on a controlled circulation basis. Non-qualifying individuals can subscribe at: £105.00/€158 pa (UK & Europe), £138.00 pa (air mail), $198 pa (USA).Cover price £4.50. All information herein is believed to be correct at time of going to press. The publisher does not accept responsibility for any errors and omissions. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the publisher. Every effort has been made to obtain copyright permission for the material contained in this publication. Angel Business Communications Ltd will be happy to acknowledge any copyright oversights in a subsequent issue of the publication.Angel Business Communications Ltd © Copyright 2012. All rights reserved. Contents may not be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of the publishers.The paper used within this magazine is produced by chain of custody certified manufacturers, guaranteeing sustainable sourcing.


US mailing information: Compound Semiconductor, ISSN 1096-598X, is published 8 times a year, Jan/Feb, March, April/May, June, July,August/September, October,November/ December by Angel Business Communications Ltd, Unit 6, Bow Court, Fletchworth Gate, Burnsall Rd,Coventry CV5 6SP. UK.The 2012 US annual subscription price is $198. Airfreight and mailing in the USA by agent named Air Business Ltd, c/o Worldnet Shipping Inc., 156-15, 146th Avenue, 2nd Floor, Jamaica, NY 11434, USA. Periodicals postage paid at Jamaica NY 11431. US Postmaster: Send address changes to Compound Semiconductor, Air Business Ltd, c/o Worldnet Shipping Inc., 156-15, 146th Avenue, 2nd Floor, Jamaica, NY 11434, USA.


Printed by: Pensord Press. ISSN 1096-598X (Print) ISSN 2042-7328 (Online) © Copyright 2012.


debbie.higham@angelbc.com jan.smoothy@angelbc.com mitch.gaynor@angelbc.com


A more balanced view comes from the analysts. They expect both classes of device to have some success, with SiC being favoured at higher voltages, such as 600 V or more.


But there is another wide bandgap material that hardly anyone is talking about that has the potential to upset the applecart: Gallium oxide. This compound (Ga2


O3 ) has some great


attributes, including an incredibly wide bandgap of almost 5 eV that should unleash ultra-high efficiency devices with tremendous breakdown voltages.


One of the weaknesses afflicting the more established wide bandgap devices is the lack of an affordable, native substrate. To be cost-competitive, GaN devices must be grown on silicon. However, this requires the development of complex deposition processes to control stresses and strains associated with hetero-epitaxy. Such issues don’t plague SiC substrates, but prices are very high and unlikely to fall fast.


In stark contrast, if Ga2 Development of Ga2 O3


substrates were made in volume, their price would be very attractive. That’s because they can be made with the approach used for the manufacture of bulk sapphire.


O3 devices is in its infancy, with researchers from the National Institute of


Communications Technology in Japan leading the way (they tell their story in the feature “Gallium oxide trumps traditional wide bandgap semiconductors”, which starts on page 21 of this issue).


As you’d expect for any nascent technology, device performance is inferior to that associated with state-of-the-art SiC and GaN devices. But compared to their ancestors, Ga2


O3


their own in some areas, while excelling in others. If Ga2


O3 power electronics is to take off, researchers in this field will have to address several


issues. For example, there are currently no reports of hole conduction in p-type layers, and devices processing technologies must be developed alongside the production of substrates at least 4 inches in diameter. And once that’s done, products will have to be brought to market that can compete with the performance of next-generation GaN and SiC devices.


So success will be hard won, and could take many years to achieve. And in my view, while it’s certainly possible that Ga2


O3 2020.


Richard Stevenson Editor


will make a commercial impact, it will not happen until at least devices hold sharon.cowley@angelbc.com robin.halder@angelbc.com shehzad.munshi@angelbc.com E: tbrun@brunmedia.com E: jjenkins@brunmedia.com


The perfect wide bandgap material When it comes to power devices, what is going to replace silicon as the dominant material?


That’s a tough question, and if you ask around you’ll get various answers. If you court the opinion of SiC diode and transistor manufacturers, you’ll be told that the future belongs to them. But that’s certainly not a view shared by the developers of GaN devices.


jackie.cannon@angelbc.com david.ridsdale@angelbc.com


editorialview


June 2012 www.compoundsemiconductor.net 3


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105