Page 82 of 111
Previous Page     Next Page        Smaller fonts | Larger fonts     Go back to the flash version

82

nanotimes News in Brief

11-06/07 :: June/July 2011

Chip Manufacturing // Electron-Beam Lithography in Hydrogen Silsesquioxane Resist © Text: Larry Hardesty, MIT

R

esearchers at MIT’s Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) present a way to get the resolu-

tion of high-speed e-beam lithography down to just nine nanometers. Combined with other emerging technologies, it could point the way toward making e-beam lithography practical as a mass-production technique.

The researchers used two tricks to improve the resolution of high-speed e-beam lithography. The first was to use a thinner resist layer, to minimize electron scattering. The second was to use a solution containing ordinary table salt to “develop” the resist, hardening the regions that received slightly more electrons but not those that received slightly less.

Pieter Kruit, a professor of physics at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands and co-founder of Mapper, a company that has built lithographic systems with 110 parallel e-beams, says that in addition to being faster, e-beam systems that deliver smaller doses of electrons are much easier to build. The larger the dose of electrons, the more en- ergy the system consumes, and the more insulation it requires between electrodes.

“That takes so much space that it’s impossible to build an instrument,” Kruit says. Kruit doubts ma-

Research Laboratory of Electronics graduate students Vitor Manfrinato and Lin Lee Cheong, with the electron-beam lithography system they used in their experiments. © Melanie Gonick

nufacturers will use exactly the resist that the MIT researchers did in their experiments. Although the researchers’ goal was to find a resist that would re- spond to small doses of electrons, the one that they settled on is actually “a little bit too sensitive,” Kruit says: The amount of electricity that an electrode de- livers to a chip surface will vary slightly, he explains, and if the resist is too sensitive to those variations, the width of the chip features will vary, too. “But that is a matter of modifying the resist slightly, and that’s what resist companies do all the time,” he adds.

Previous arrowPrevious Page     Next PageNext arrow        Smaller fonts | Larger fonts     Go back to the flash version
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  24  |  25  |  26  |  27  |  28  |  29  |  30  |  31  |  32  |  33  |  34  |  35  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  39  |  40  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  45  |  46  |  47  |  48  |  49  |  50  |  51  |  52  |  53  |  54  |  55  |  56  |  57  |  58  |  59  |  60  |  61  |  62  |  63  |  64  |  65  |  66  |  67  |  68  |  69  |  70  |  71  |  72  |  73  |  74  |  75  |  76  |  77  |  78  |  79  |  80  |  81  |  82  |  83  |  84  |  85  |  86  |  87  |  88  |  89  |  90  |  91  |  92  |  93  |  94  |  95  |  96  |  97  |  98  |  99  |  100  |  101  |  102  |  103  |  104  |  105  |  106  |  107  |  108  |  109  |  110  |  111