search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Utah Best State for Family Stability


It leads among adults who are married and raise their children through high school years.


State Utah


Idaho Nebraska


South Dakota Wyoming Kansas


North Dakota Iowa


Texas


Minnesota Alaska


Oklahoma Kentucky Arkansas


New Jersey Indiana Virginia Missouri Montana


Tennessee


North Carolina Washington Hawaii


Wisconsin Colorado Alabama


South Carolina New Hampshire Ohio


Maine Maryland


West Virginia Delaware


Pennsylvania Georgia Arizona


Mississippi Michigan Florida


Connecticut Illinois Oregon


Louisiana California Vermont


Massachusetts Nevada


New York


New Mexico Rhode Island


FAMILY STRUCTURE INDEX | 2025 Rank


1


2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


10 11


12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19


20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50


80.5 78.1 77.2 75.3 75.1 71.1


70.3 69.3 67.9 67.2 67.2 65.9 65.1 64.1 63.5 63.5 62.8 61.8 61.1


60.6 60.5 59.6 59


58.1 57.4 55.4 55.4 55.4 54.8 54.2 53.4 53.1 52.7 52.3 52.3 50.9 50.8 50.7 48.9 48.1 47.9 44.8 44.7 43.1 40.7 34.2 32.1


Index Score % Prime-aged Adults Married 94.4 85.4 82


68


64.6 62.3 60.2 63


62.3 60.7 60.8 60.3 59.3 57.8 59.8 58.9 59.3 58.5 58.4 59.4 58.5 58.8 57.7 57.9 58.6 55.2 56.9 58.8 56.8 56.5 58.2 55.7 56.5 55.6 55.4 53.3 56


55.7 54.9 54.8 55.2 53.6 55.5 55.7 55.8 52


54.8 55.4 54.7 52.8 52.1


49.5 50.8


A


BY VAN CHARLES


new study of marriage stability and birth rates ranks Utah as the state with the most family stability — and


Rhode Island with the least. Utah came in with a ranking of 94.4, while Rhode Island only scored 32.1, according to the Family Structure Index. The index analyzes demographic and


fertility data to determine which states are best situated to improve the prospects for happy and healthy children and the economic well-being of a state. Developed by Brad Wilcox, a sociology


professor and director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, the index is composed of three main components. The first is the percentage of “prime- aged” adults (ages 25-54) who are married. Second is the average number of


lifetime births, which the index refers to as fertility rate, for women in the state. Third is the percentage of children in


the state who are “raised intact,” defined in the study as living with their married birth or adoptive parents between the ages of 15 and 17. Wilcox developed the index in partnership with the Center for Christian Virtue and the Family Institute for Family Studies, which is an allied family policy council with the Center for Christian Virtue. “It starts with a commitment to


addressing the root cause driving the challenges in our communities,” he said, “the decline of marriage and the collapse of family. Changing course requires both church and state solutions.” Wilcox recommends churches


emphasize marriage and family, celebrate marriage, and incorporate its benefits in preaching. “Marriage is the most common pathway for the faithful to grow in holiness and happiness,” he said. “Accordingly, churches should routinely proclaim an inspiring vision of marriage where the beauty, goodness, power, and dificulties of marriage and family life can be shared in age-appropriate ways to the entire congregation.” According to data posted on the


website for the Institute for Family Studies, 97% of young people who follow all three steps of the sequence — graduate, get a job, and marry before children — do not live in poverty as adults.


APRIL 2025 | NEWSMAX 19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100