search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PRODUCTION


EDITING CRAFT


...COW


Andrea Arnold’s documentary, Cow, won Best Edited British Doc at the BFE Awards. Rebecca Lloyd explains how she, and editors Nicolas Chaudeurge and Jacob Secher Schulsinger, brought Luma’s world to life


How did Andrea Arnold brief you? Andrea wanted Luma to be seen. We were to ‘watch her watch the world’, and not to assume what she was thinking. To be pure and true to the life of a dairy farm cow only using scenes that were shot on that day.


Was the edit a daunting task? Starting any documentary is a little daunting when you have a blank timeline and lots of footage to watch not knowing what you are going to find. I started my career editing at The NHU, so it was familiar and nice to return to observing and editing


animal behaviour. As it was spaced out over four years when key events happened it helped not to feel too overwhelmed, and I was able to keep up with the shoot. I actually looked forward to the next lot of rushes coming in, learning more about the working of a dairy farm, seeing how much Malu had grown and how Luma was getting on. I felt a strong emotional connection to Luma and even went to the farm to meet her.


Was the lack of dialogue a challenge Beginning a project knowing it was to be purely a visual story was a new experience. The sound team was amazing and played a huge role in enhancing the world of the dairy farm and the cows. Many people say that when you are watching the film you have your own internal dialogue going on. I certainly did.


The film is so spare, was there nowehere to hide as an editor? Staying on a shot for a long time forces you to surrender to the viewing experience and gives you time to think ‘what is she feeling?’ Not cutting was the key as then you know it is not manipulated.


How difficult was it to construct a narrative? Andrea knew from the beginning she wanted the film to begin with an eye and end on an eye, following the life of a cow and calf from birth to death to birth. This didn’t go as planned with Malu’s pregnancy but that is true to life. The narrative closely follows the daily routine of the dairy farm with milking being at its core.


How did you avoid anthropomorphising? During the edit we were all conscious of not assuming what Luma was thinking but there were many times in Luma’s behaviour that showed human characteristics it was hard not to anthropomorphize. One of my favourite moments that was captured all in one shot is just after Luma has given birth for the second time. She is licking her new-born clean and sees a calf trying to climb out of the pen and instinctively goes over and nudges it back in. It is a beautiful moment showing Luma’s protective motherly instincts.


How was working as a team of editors? We were a tag team, so we never worked at the same time. The film would not be the same without all of us. We call ourselves the three Musketeers.


time to think ‘what is she feeling?’.” Rebecca Lloyd, Editor, Cow


Cow 86 televisual.com Summer 2022


“Staying on a shot for a long time forces you to surrender to the viewing experience and gives you


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122