search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOCUS


The rating approach Justin Francis presents his outline of a new fire and safety rating system designed for medium and high rise buildings worldwide


buildings. The B-FLSR will provide information to occupants on the level and type of fi re and life safety protection within the building that they occupy, and has the ability to encourage a proactive approach to building fi re and life safety. An alternative name for the B-FLSR is the Fire and Life Safety Rating (Fals Rating). Within buildings, the variety of occupants is


T


diverse, ranging from young children and families to customers passing through retail space, offi ce workers, schoolchildren in vertical schools and elderly occupants enjoying their retirement years in high rise retirement apartments. All of these people possess different capabilities with regard to responding to emergencies, and in general are unaware of the level of fire and life safety that is in place. Buildings are constructed to standards and


codes, and these important guidelines continually evolve as more advanced solutions are identifi ed. It is true that most new buildings are constructed to very high standards in order to meet the newest and most advanced standards and codes. In respect of compliance with current fi re and life safety standards, the goal is often to build to meet


32 JUNE 2019 www.frmjournal.com


HIS ARTICLE will outline a Building – Fire and Life Safety Rating (B-FLSR) system aimed at both old and new medium and high rise


the minimum standard, or potentially provide fi re engineered solutions when they cannot be met. Currently, the benefi ts of constructing above


the minimum standard range from limited to none. When we assess existing buildings that are built to older standards and codes, there is very little option or incentive to improve or retrofi t. The life span of most buildings is unknown and we need to determine when a building built to a 50 year old standard is deemed no longer suitable without some form of modifi cation. Changes to codes and standards are often


implemented after major incidents have revealed defi ciencies. Amongst the major incidents that have driven change are the: • 11 September World Trade Centre attack in New York, USA (2001) – building evacuation concepts and structural integrity were highly analysed and changes implemented, including the third stairwell for buildings over 128m (420ft), and incorporating occupant evacuation lifts and widening stairwells for new buildings


• Grenfell Tower fi re in London, UK (2017) – a wide ranging, ongoing review





Lacrosse fi re in Melbourne, Australia (2014) – this brought existing standards and


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60