search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Fines and prosecutions Nightclub receives prohibition notice


VOODOO LOUNGE in Accrington was closed down hours after reopening when Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service (LFRS) handed the owners a prohibition notice over fire safety concerns. This Is Lancashire reported


on the closure of the Accrington nightclub, which was ‘newly- refurbished’ and had opened ‘just hours’ before the notice was served by LFRS officers. The club owners claimed it had been ‘broken into’ and had seen a ‘considerable amount of damage’ alongside having ‘numerous pieces of equipment stolen’. However, it later turned out that


the venue had been closed down by senior LFRS officers who issued a prohibition order, having visited in the early hours of the morning after receiving reports of fire safety concerns. They issued the notice the following day, ordering the owners to ‘cease trading until a number of safety concerns had been rectified’. The club had already closed


down after a previous relaunch, due to a burst pipe flooding the building, and the police licensing department was due to inspect


raised by the fire service on Saturday.’ A spokesperson for the nightclub


it before the prohibition notice was served. An LFRS spokesperson stated: ‘We sent a senior officer to the premises just before the club was due to close and the officer then returned to the club later that afternoon with another member of the fire service and inspected and a number of fire safety concerns were found. ‘A prohibition notice was issued and an investigation is now under way. They will not be able to re-open the club until the safety concerns are dealt with. We believe concerns were


responded that it had been targeted by burglars on the opening night, and had seen £10,000 worth of money, audio and visual equipment, stock, fixtures and fittings, a CCTV box and other goods stolen. They added that the crime had been reported, but that they had not received a log number ‘as they had been broken into a number of times before and had never had the situation resolved’. The spokesperson commented:


‘There’s a handful of people trying to wreck our business and the concerns the fire service had were raised following the break-in. The fire service received four hoax calls on Friday morning, from someone saying there was a fire at the club. ‘All four times, we were cleared


and given the go-ahead to open. Our utmost priority is public safety which is why we agreed to have the fire brigade come back after the break-in and we are now complying with the prohibition notice.’


Jail sentence for pub landlord over fire issues Rod Schneider, business


TONY STEARMAN received his sentence after he failed to ensure his pub in Exeter met fire safety standards. Devon Live reported on the


prosecution and sentencing of Mr Stearman, who was the landlord of the Poachers Inn in Ide. Officers from Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service (DSFRS) inspected the pub in 2017 and found that Mr Stearman had ‘failed to implement’ the recommendations made in a recent fire risk assessment. Among the breaches of the


Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 [FSO] of which he was accused was the fact that the fire detection and warning system ‘fell far short of the standard expected’ in a premises that provided guest accommodation, while the


escape route from this accommodation ‘was not adequately protected by fire resisting construction’, and ‘discharged directly’ into the bar. Finally, a linen cupboard


situated in the escape route housed an electrically powered immersion heater and, when asked why he had not acted on the recommendations made, Mr Stearman said he had treated it as something that he ‘ought to do’ rather than something ‘he had to do’.


He pleaded guilty at Exeter


Magistrates Court to five offences under the FSO, and was sentenced to 17 weeks in jail suspended for 18 months, alongside being ordered to pay £5,000 in costs to DSFRS and a victim surcharge of £115.


safety manager at DSFRS, commented: ‘Mr Stearman understood the need for a fire risk assessment, yet failed to comply with the requirements of the Fire Safety Order by ignoring advice from those he had appointed to assist. ‘He was well aware of his fire


safety responsibilities and the need to ensure people visiting and staying at the premises were safe yet put lives at risk by prioritising profit over safety. ‘The majority of businesses


in Devon and Somerset take their responsibilities seriously. However, those that decide to place people at unnecessary risk will be subject to appropriate enforcement action by DSFRS.’


www.frmjournal.com JUNE 2019 17


NEWS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60