This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
MY OPINION


CONTROLS ON THE INCREASE


In 2017 Port State Control inspections on yachts in the Paris MoU area increased by 13% on 2016 with 275 yachts being inspected. 22 yachts were detained – an increase of over 400% on 2016! And Franc Jansen suggests that this is just the beginning...


F


or the purposes of this article, I am going to assume that you do care about the safety of all on board your yacht and you work hard to maintain the standards upheld by the MLC and international safety requirements. But I am also going to assume that you run a busy yacht, schedules and plans change almost every day and your plate is forever full. The sort of ongoing situation which, with the best will in the world, can see some procedures or demands slipping and which in turn could result in you failing a PSC.


Today, the chances of your yacht being controlled are higher than they have ever been and yet some owners and their captains still feel comfortable running their yachts regardless of that risk and the important consequences of being detained or arrested for deficiencies.


Playing the probability game, the chances of being inspected would seem slim. But for me, there are two inherent flaws in that logic. The first is one of mindset. PSC exist purely as an added incentive, if one were needed, for owners and captains to ensure their yachts are being run in accordance with MLC 2006 and international safety requirements.


They are not ‘traps’ for owners or captains, they are checks for the benefit of all on board. Running a yacht that is knowingly (or even unknowingly) deficient in any aspect of Maritime Regulations and MLC poses enormous safety risks for all on board never mind the consequences of any control that uncovers them.


The second flaw in the logic, is that it misses one major fact: PSC are not random. And the longer a vessel goes without being controlled, the higher up the priority list is goes. Yachts are selected based on their age, flag, classification society, ISM provider etc.


The Paris MOU describes exactly how they prioritise ships. Their website even provides a risk calculator.


For me, the emphasis must always be on safety first. And if you are running a yacht professionally and according to good seamanship you will pass a PSC inspection. However, one can not ignore the consequences of failing a PS control for the senior officers on board, the management company, the flag and also Class. So how do you prepare for a PSC…. ?


First of all ensure that the yacht is run to a good (mini) ISM system. Ask your ISM company to do an internal audit. This will highlight any issues that PSC may find as well. Also independent surveyors such as ourselves will be able to carry out an audit for you. Lloyds Register provides a checklist, which is aimed at commercial shipping, but which is also useful for yachts.


Learn from other people’s mistakes. The top 10 PSC deficiencies on yachts in 2017 are listed here. Make sure that you do not get caught out.


TOP 10 PSC DEFICIENCIES ON YACHTS IN 2017


1 NAUTICAL PUBLICATIONS 2 CHARTS 3 GARBAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 CONTINUOUS SYNOPSIS RECORDS 5 FREEBOARD MARKS 6 VOYAGE / PASSAGE PLANS 7 ENDORSEMENT BY FLAG STATE 8 MEANS OF ESCAPE 9 SAFETY RADIO (INCL EXCEPTION) 10 ISM


It is also good to have clear guidelines for the crew on how to behave during a PSC inspection. This list is too long for this article but most importantly; be professional. don’t lie and don’t try to blag you way through. It won’t work! Also avoid arguments, state your case and move on.


A PSC is disruptive so you want to keep it as short as possible. You need to give the confidence that your yacht is a safe yacht. As soon as the inspector is satisfied that the yacht is well run and safe, he will wrap up his inspection and leave.


For more details Tel: +377 97700173 or visit www.jmsyachting.com


ONBOARD | SUMMER 2018 | 17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168