ExEcutivE REPORt Not easily dismissed
Charlotte Morris, senior solicitor at ESP Law, examines the practicalities of employing or dismissing apprentices.
F
irms employ apprentices for any number of reasons, chief of which are the cost
savings available given that a lower minimum wage applies specifically for apprentices aged under 19, or aged 19 and over who are in the first year of their apprenticeship. However, there are non- financial benefits for employers too. They can train apprentices not only in how to perform the role, but how to do so in line with the preferred methods.
The practicalities of employing and dismissing apprentices depends largely on the type of apprenticeship agreement in use. Using the wrong contract is the main pitfall for employers to be wary of; it can make dismissing an apprentice, even for gross misconduct, high risk.
Approved English Apprenticeship Agreement If a business operates within a sector for which the government has published an approved apprenticeship standard, then it should seek to engage apprentices on an ‘approved English apprenticeship agreement’. This is governed by the rules under ASCLA 2009 (Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009). Employers can check the list of sectors for which approved standards have been produced or see an example of the standards and required learning outcomes on the Institute for Apprenticeship’s website.
There are many reasons why an employer may seek to end an apprenticeship agreement early, including a downturn in work, poor attitude to work or attendance issues. It is much easier to dismiss an apprentice employed under an approved
English apprenticeship agreement as they are treated far more as a standard employee would be in terms of their employment law rights.
If a dispute arises over the nature of a particular apprenticeship the courts will determine which form of apprenticeship agreement is in place. ASCLA sets out various criteria that the contract must meet to be classified as an approved English apprenticeship agreement. If a contract does not comply with the provisions of ASCLA and fails to include all the relevant provisions required, it may be determined that a common law contract of apprenticeship has been entered into.
Common Law Contracts of Apprenticeship Traditional apprenticeships are a contract under common law in England and Wales. The primary purpose of the contract of apprenticeship is training and teaching, to enable the apprentice to secure the required qualification. Work is only a secondary purpose of the contract.
A traditional apprenticeship cannot be lawfully terminated before the expiry of the fixed term contract, except in exceptional circumstances. This is because the contract is entered into to enable the apprentice to receive training and obtain qualifications as a means to obtain better employment. This gives the apprentice far greater employment rights than an ordinary employee.
If an employer terminates a contract of apprenticeship early, and as a result deprives the apprentice of training, the apprentice is entitled to claim damages for wrongful dismissal under the contract. The remedy for such a claim would include their loss of earnings for the remainder of the fixed-term apprenticeship in addition to damages for future loss of earnings and prospects as a qualified person. This applies even if the individual is a poor performer or is having difficulty passing any of the exams. The apprentice would be able to make a claim regardless of whether there are
conduct issues such as time keeping and attendance. Even a genuine redundancy situation, such as a downturn in work, would not entitle an employer to terminate a traditional apprenticeship agreement.
Employers can still discipline a traditional apprentice, but it will only be safe to dismiss, except in exceptional circumstances, in certain situations.
These include where an employer completely closes down the business; where the nature of an employer's business changes to such an extent that the employer cannot properly teach the apprentice the trade or profession that was intended to be taught; and where the agreement is terminated by mutual agreement.
Terminating Employment at the Expiry of the Apprenticeship The expiry of any fixed term employment contract constitutes a dismissal and as such employers need to have both a fair reason and follow a fair procedure in doing so if they are to minimise the risk of resultant claims. In many instances this will be ‘some other substantial reason’ and the employer will be able to say that the apprenticeship was a one-off agreement and there is no need for it to be renewed once it has been completed and a qualification obtained. At the end of the fixed term the apprentice will not be deemed redundant if they do not get a new contract and, therefore, they are not entitled to redundancy pay.
Training fee agreements are not uncommon for apprentices; however, employers need to be mindful of how the apprenticeship has been funded. If the co-funded levy has been utilised, an apprentice cannot be required to contribute towards this on termination or otherwise including as part of any training fee agreement.
Summary While apprentices are employed to learn, they also have rights. Their position is not sacrosanct, but good advice is necessary if they are to be dismissed. n
14 Executive Hire News - September 2022
You’re FIRED!
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44
