search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
OPINION


How the Grinch stole bicycles S


The story of how Cycling UK persuaded BTP to reverse its policy By Duncan Dollimore, Head of Campaigns, Cycling UK


ee it, say it, sort it yourself. That seemed to be the message from British Transport Police (BTP) last year to anyone whose bike was stolen at a train station.


If you’ve cycled to catch a train, chances


are you’re going to need to leave it there for longer than two hours. You might be planning to return later that day or even the next, but most of the time, the train journey itself is longer than two hours. That’s why in October last year, we were shocked to learn British Transport Police had a new policy to refuse the investigation of cycle thefts where the bike was left at the station for more than two hours, or where the bike was worth less than £200. Cycling UK members started contacting us about the issue, having received replies from BTP refusing to look at CCTV footage. Realising the impact this would have on people who rely on bikes as part of their journey, we immediately released a statement condemning the policy. Rather than


46 | March 2026


take the opportunity to concede that the BTP crime screening policy was badly worded and commit to reviewing it, they chose to defend it, and a few days later, I was heading up to Manchester on a Sunday evening to talk about the issue on BBC Breakfast. We know our members and supporters are passionate about cycling, but we saw many other people recognise the policy’s faults and how it effectively decriminalised theft. After we wrote formally to BTP asking them to urgently review


their policy, we began to see people contact their MPs, making the same arguments we were. In the beginning, BTP doubled down. They replied to our letter saying what we said about their policy wasn’t true, even though we quoted directly from it. MPs who wrote to BTP also started to receive cut-and-paste responses to the same effect. No matter what people asked, they got the same response.


www.bikebiz.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68