point to a deeper structural misalignment. Seeing community as a studio-wide function helps leadership interpret those red flags before it’s too late.
SHARED OWNERSHIP Seeing community as a function changes how responsibility is distributed. Too many studios nowadays still localize flaws. When sentiment takes a hit
or forums become a warzone, moderation teams get the blame. marketing messaging. If players are confused, there’s something wrong with the patch notes or marketing messaging. These things are usually downstream symptoms of fundamental
product failures. When you treat community management as a single owner, you risk framing deep game design issues as “communication challenges.” You end up burning cycles trying to explain and justify decisions that players fundamentally hate, instead of stepping back and making sure that you’re delivering the game players thought they bought.
OWNERSHIP CHANGES THE PRODUCT When a studio shifts its mindset and treats community as a cross- functional discipline, the entire development conversation changes. You can see this play out in Baldur’s Gate 3. Larian Studios’ smash
hit was developed in public through an extended early access period of about 3 years where player feedback directly informed mechanics, balance, and narrative pacing. Larian built structured feedback loops into their development
time, and let community sentiment shape decisions across multiple teams. Needless to say, it launched with strong player retention, critical reception, and sustained engagement driven by trust in the studio’s responsiveness – and their success speaks for itself. As the cherry on top, the game has consistently won Best Community Support at The Game Awards for the past three years. Community
managers are the feedback loop between players and the rest of the studio. They surface patterns in sentiment from flagging friction early to translating player feedback into insights that the rest of the studio can act on.
It’s the studio’s job to make sure they’re set up to receive and act
on these insights. Community teams should be actively involved in discussions with teams across the game’s development, especially when it comes to the features, updates or balance changes which they observe people’s reactions to every day. They are the voice of the player in the room where decisions happen. In that structure, community managers are spokespeople for both sides. They explain studio decisions to players and make sure the proper internal teams know how people are feeling about the product. The goal is to prevent community management from becoming crisis control every time. Community management is an injection of raw sentiment and feedback right into a studio’s veins, and a way to course- correct before small issues become full problems. This isn’t to suggest that a studio designs their games by Reddit
committee or chases every complaint. Recognizing behavioral patterns is what matters. Metrics can be manipulated, but behavior tells you what players value. If they engage, participate, and invest time, your loop is working. If they disengage, something is broken, even when your DAU charts look fine.
EMPOWERING THE ROLE None of this diminishes the role of community professionals. In fact, it elevates them. These are your data analysts, your trend spotters, and your most direct line to player sentiment. But expecting a handful of community managers to carry the full
weight of the studio’s relationship with its audience is a recipe for high turnover and burnout. Community managers are most effective when they act as connective tissue, when their insights directly inform product decisions, and when the C-suite recognizes that community health is a shared outcome. It is easy to talk about community in terms of Discord
integrations, social media tools, or moderation roles. But at its core, community is the relationship between your developers and the people spending time in the worlds you built. You cannot make a single department responsible for your
relationship with the player. As an industry, we need to shift the conversation from “Who owns community?” to “How do we build a game that earns one?” and in the process, finally give community professionals their due.
July/August 2026 MCV/DEVELOP | 19
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56
