search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Manufacturing technology


A: Schematic illustrating the as-deposited radial bimetallic structure arrangement, material removal boundaries for subsequent milling procedures, and the cut plane location used to provide microstructural analysis.


operative technique. Then there’s the prospect of printing components for machines in need of repair. This strategy proved particularly useful during the Covid-19 pandemic, when hospitals were able to print parts for their ventilators and respirators on site. According to GlobalData, the medical 3D printing market stood at $2bn globally in 2022 and is growing at more than 21% a year. This rise is being fuelled not only by more ‘traditional’ applications – orthopaedics, dental devices, and personalised devices – but also by its use within diagnosis and medical training. For instance, surgeons might hone their skills on a 3D-printed anatomical model before they operate on an actual patient. Many of the most exciting potential use cases, however, remain some way from the clinic. Research teams worldwide are working on everything from a programmable 3D-printed wound dressing to a 3D-printed heart replica that pumps just like the real thing. There is even a group working on 3D-printed hair follicles, set within lab- cultured human skin.


It would be remiss, too, not to mention the fast- emerging field of bioprinting – bodily tissue printed using the patient’s own cells. 3D-printed mini- organs have already been tested successfully in animals, and the hope is that 3D-printed organs could one day eliminate the need for organ donation. (Exciting though it is, that scenario is probably 20 years away or more.)


Stronger joint replacements At the less splashy – yet no less innovative – end of the spectrum, 3D printing is enabling big steps forward in material science. Amit Bandyopadhyay, Boeing Distinguished Professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University, is developing a technique that could one day have profound implications for joint replacements. His team have found a way to 3D-print two types of steel in the same circular layer, creating a material that’s stronger than either metal alone. Their findings were published in the journal Nature Communications in June 2023. The team began by thinking about trees and bones – natural materials that derive their strength


Medical Device Developments / www.nsmedicaldevices.com


from layered rings of different materials. If you look at cross sections of cut wood, you will notice radial rings, formed by seasonal variations in wood growth. It’s a similar story with bone. “We hypothesise that such radial layering improves the mechanical properties of the overall structure,” says Bandyopadhyay.


Figuring that it might be possible to do the same thing with metals, the researchers used two welding machines of the type generally found in automotive shops. These machines were used to 3D-print two different metals in a circular layer, without any need to stop or change metal wires.


Although the metals were deposited at the same time, they cooled at different rates, and the resulting pressure fused the two together. The researchers think this pressure accounts for the increase in strength – in tests, the resulting composite material was 33–42% stronger than either metal taken alone. “This process is called wire arc-directed energy deposition,” says Bandyopadhyay. “We have also tried a powder-based directed energy deposition process and found that the concept works. So it is not process-dependent but design-dependent.” As he explains, the technique could be used with different materials depending on what you’re hoping to achieve. For instance, you could opt for a harder outer layer and a more ductile inner layer, providing high wear-resistance on the surface but good toughness overall. You could even start combining three or more materials, all 3D-printed within the same circular layer. Within the medical devices field, you might be able to create joint replacements that have titanium on the outside and magnetic steel on the inside. As Bandyopadhyay explains, magnetic fields have been shown to help in bone healing. “It’s a simple idea – titanium alloys offer excellent corrosion and fatigue resistance, but not such good biocompatibility,” he says. “Medical devices could be printed using the radial bimetallic structure concept, where the outside is titanium alloy and the inside is a magnetic material. So the overall device would offer better biocompatibility than a regular titanium implant, but similar corrosion and fatigue resistance.”


57


B: Polished cross- sectional image showing build direction and the interlocking zig- zag pattern of wedge- shaped protrusions of stainless material in the core into the mild steel casing, and vice versa.


© Nature Communications/ Lile Squires, Ethan Roberts & Amit Bandyopadhyay - Washington State University


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136