search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sweeteners


Of all the artifi cial sweeteners, aspartame has attracted the most controversy, frequently being linked to major health conditions, not least cancer. Opinions from regulatory bodies about its safety seem to confl ict, which is confusing for consumers. Jim Banks speaks to the experts at the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer and the International Sweeteners Association to explore whether aspartame is actually safe for human consumption.


Sweet and safe? T


he market for artificial sweeteners grows steadily with each passing year, as they find their way into more and more products, and as large segments of the consumer population seek to reduce their calorie intake. The global market for diet soft drinks, for example, was worth around $5.8bn in 2022, but some analysts expect it to exceed $9bn by 2030. Similarly, growth in the global market for aspartame – one of the most common sweeteners used in diet soft drinks – shows no sign of slowing. Having been introduced in the 1980s, it has become a staple ingredient in many food and beverage products, including chewing gum, ice cream, yoghurt, breakfast cereal and toothpaste, as well as diet


drinks. And, despite its growing popularity, its market could potentially grow even faster were it not for some dark clouds on the horizon. These clouds come in the form of some major health concerns. One of the latest research papers on the topic, ‘Aspartame carcinogenic potential revealed through network toxicology and molecular docking insights’ published by Nature in May 2024, suggests that aspartame, “has the potential to impact various cancer- related proteins, potentially raising the likelihood of cellular carcinogenesis by interfering with biomolecular function”. Furthermore, the study found that the action patterns and pathways of aspartame- related targets are like the mechanisms of known


82


Ingredients Insight / www.ingredients-insight.com


KAOLERY SAECHAO/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110