Talking Timber: Fire Safety | 99
Dr Daniel Brandon discusses recent advances in fire safety for mass timber buildings COMBUSTIBILITY CHALLENGE
In the past two decades, the introduction of glued laminated timber (GLT) and cross-laminated timber (CLT) has allowed for the use of timber as a structural material in increasingly complex buildings. This has led to a significant increase in the maximum height of mass timber buildings, which is now approximately five times higher than the tallest mass timber building in 2005. The global production of CLT has also
doubled every four years, reaching around 2 million m3 in 2020.
While the use of mass timber is considered a viable response to the climate crisis due to its ability to store carbon, its combustibility presents new challenges in terms of fire safety compared to concrete and steel. As the quantity of mass timber structures increases, so does the significance of these fire safety challenges. To identify and address these challenges, a growing number of large-scale compartment fire tests have been conducted in the past decade. These tests have revealed the impact of exposed or partially encapsulated timber surfaces on fire growth, smoke development, flame spread rates, and the exposure to the structure, façade, or adjacent buildings. As regulations to some extent already address the contribution of exposed surfaces to fire growth and smoke development through surface class requirements, recent research has focused more on understanding the impact of the timber structure itself on the structural fire exposure and façade exposure. Ensuring that a structure withstands a fire that consumes all combustible content in a room is a common approach to prevent collapse. If the structure is combustible, however, this starting point cannot be used as the structure itself would be allowed to be consumed. Avoiding an increased risk of collapse in mass timber buildings by fires in situations where effective fire service intervention cannot be assumed, therefore requires limiting the fuel contribution of the timber structure to the fire. If significant, increasing the resistance to this contribution becomes essential. In addition, risks can be reduced by lowering the likelihood of such fires occurring (for example, by using sprinklers). Several recent research efforts have indicated that the fuel contribution of mass timber can be limited by limiting the surface area of visible timber and preventing significant increases of timber combustion rates during the fire. A recent study, titled “fire safe implementation of visible timber in tall buildings”, included five large scale tests that showed that preventing such increases of combustion rates by (a) using an enhanced CLT adhesive that prevented fire induced delamination and (b) preventing significant charring behind gypsum boards,
Dr Daniel Brandon is a senior research scientist at RISE, Research Institutes of Sweden
allowed fire to continuously decay while exposing a surface area up to twice the floor area. This is in stark contrast with previous tests where such measures were not implemented and no tendency to continuously decay or to decay at all was observed. The study, however, emphasised the importance of maintaining a sufficient distance between exposed walls to limit interaction and highlighted the correlation between the extent of exposed mass timber surfaces and the required fire resistance to prevent collapse. Additionally, the study developed a predictive model and started addressing insurance-related aspects such as post-fire CLT repair, strategies for monitoring and extinguishing remaining smouldering, and minimising water damage. See:
https://www.ri.se/en/what-we-do/projects/ fire-safe-implementation-of-mass-timber-in- tall-buildings
Below: Structural performance is only one aspect of fire safety
Despite the significant advancements in knowledge, it is crucial to adopt a cautious approach when it comes to designing timber buildings and to recognise that structural performance is only one aspect of fire safety. Especially in countries where regulations have not yet been adjusted to incorporate the effects of timber, care must be taken in implementing current regulations to ensure safe evacuation and mitigate external fire spread as well. ■
www.ttjonline.com | July/August 2023 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109
