| 63
the building industry has the framework it needs to deliver more, and better, high quality homes,” states the government. Opening the STA roundtable, chief
executive Andrew Carpenter said the BSA represented “huge change for everyone”. “There’s an assumption post Grenfell that it’s all about high risk, high rise building,” he said, “It’s not – the whole industry is affected.”
He described the building safety regime to date as weak. “There’s a general competence deficit and, as a result, the majority of buildings don’t perform as they should. The industry now faces really moving to a different gear.”
But he stressed he was not negative or pessimistic. He welcomes the BSA and the changes it brings. “After Grenfell, there was a loss of confidence in UK construction. But the goal of government is an industry that works better. I see the BSA resulting in an industry that works in a more joined up way, is more competent, efficient and productive and better understands what it’s required to do. It will also mean paying more attention to training and looking after our people – which will improve our image and attract new talent.” The CIC’s Graham Watts highlighted a number of industry initiatives focused on driving safety standards, but didn’t fight shy of pointing out areas for improvement. He said the Construction Leadership Council, for which he is a Building Safety workstream lead, is focusing on four key topics of relevance to BSA implementation and compliance; competence, products, clarity/ transparency and insurance.
He is also on the board of the government-
backed not-for-profit Building a Safer Future (BSF), which is committed to driving safety standards and transparency. It has just announced the first nine companies – signatories to the BSF Charter – to be awarded the status BSF Champions. While welcoming their achievement Mr Watts said more businesses needed to sign up to demonstrate the sector’s safety commitment. “After three years of the Charter, still not all its early adopters have signed up to it,” he said. “There’s a massive reputational risk to the industry if it fails. If you’re from a company that’s eligible to sign – a contractor, engineer, product manufacturer or architect – I urge you to do so.”
He also described the work of the industry-led Competence Steering Group (CSG), established to develop proposals for increasing competence in design, construction, inspection, maintenance and management of buildings. “New frameworks have been developed for 12 key areas and, while progress has not been as fast in some as we’d have hoped, in others we’re ready to go with new competence standards,” he said.
With the roundtable opened for discussion, participants shared views on the challenges in the BSA, but also potential benefits. “It will make for a more costly industry, but it will be the true cost of construction – so far we’ve massively undervalued how much it costs to build things,” said one. “Either clients will pay more, or it will give us that nudge to finally understand what productivity actually means for construction and shift it into that digital future we’re all talking about.” The challenge to raise building sector competence proved to be another hot topic. “As a contractor and quantity surveyor I’ve visited many sites and often walked away shaking my head because competency was so poor,” said another attendee. “The bar we’ve set ourselves is so low. To raise it, and take holistic responsibility for the quality of buildings – safety being a part – we must set an entry level that’s a minimum standard for competence.”
Mr Carpenter said that the STA and the rest of the industry was increasingly focused on improving skills and competence and the BSA would drive still greater efforts. “Anyone who thinks it will mean current bad behaviours will vanish overnight is in cloud cuckoo land,” he said. “But under the Act someone will be accountable for them, with a responsible person at each stage of the process, from principle designer, through contractors, to health and safety professionals.”
Construction Products Association
chief executive Peter Caplehorn said the appointment of the HSE as new Building Safety Regulator under the BSA would also have significant impact. But he pointed out that the Construction Design and Management Regulations already give a clear steer on the industry’s obligations.
“It’s about sensibly planning work so risks involved are managed start to finish and having the right people for the right job at the right time,” he said. “It also entails communicating the right information about risks and their management to those who need to know.”
Some participants felt the growth in modular homes and offsite construction could help drive building safety and quality. “But UK MMC/modular capacity is currently 20,000 units a year and government is targeting 300,000 hew homes annually, so there’s a huge challenge, but also opportunity to upscale it,” said one attendee. Mr Carpenter said that strengthening skills and competence in the sector was also core to increase timber construction output, but added that raising levels was a key priority area too for the Timber in Construction Working Group, on which he sits. “The Group has until the end of the summer to come up with a roadmap on the topic with metrics and milestones for improvement,” he said. The
www.gov.uk summary of the BSA concludes that it delivers “far-reaching protections for leaseholders from the cost of remediating building safety defects and an ambitious toolkit of measures to allow those responsible for building safety to be held to account”.
Mr Caplehorn elaborated on this theme, tying it in with the Grenfell disaster. “A key issue with Grenfell, was inappropriate, bad product substitution,” he said. “In future, if someone makes a change that’s inappropriate [on a building project], there’s a duty holder who is answerable to the Building Safety Regulator. If anyone in the supply chain, says fine, make the change, just bear in mind that you have signed off on it and are liable.” ■
Above: Some roundtable participants felt the growth in modular homes and offsite construction could help drive building safety and quality
www.ttjonline.com | July/August 2023 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109
