COUNCIL COMMANDMENTS
CONTROVERSIAL NEW POINTS RULES HAVE BEEN PASSED BY LEEDS CITY COUNCIL
Controversial changes to how
Leeds taxi and private hire drivers are policed have been passed by the city council. LeedsLive reports that cabbies in the city who are guilty of minor motoring offences could now be stripped of their licence once they reach nine penalty points, down from the current threshold of 12. The decision’s been made despite widespread and furious opposition from drivers, who’ve warned it will lead to an exodus from the trade and a shortage of taxis for passengers as a result. The council says the new policy will improve public safety and has been prompted by
new gov-
ernment guidance to councils. Speaking at a meeting of the council’s Executive Board on 21 September, when the policy was passed, the authority’s leader Cllr Debra Coupar said: “80% of drivers licenced by the council have no points. The proposed changes would affect just 1% of current licence holders. That’s around 70 drivers out of around 5,000.” Under the new rules, drivers who clock up seven or eight points on their licence will have to attend training sessions. Should a driver reach the nine-point threshold through minor offences, they could lose their licence if they’ve previously had to attend training as a disciplinary measure. However, the council insists each case will be judged on its merits and the final decision will be made by a panel of councillors. Cllr Coupar added: “There is no automatic removal of a licence under the options proposed. The
56
council will only revoke a licence for minor motoring offences where there is a clear concern for public safety.” Local cabbies have demonstrated several times against the proposals, which have been on the table in some form or other for the last two years. They claim the measures are too strict and that cabbies are far more likely to fall foul of the rules than average drivers, due to the distances they cover. Ahmad Hussain, chair of the Leeds Private Hire Organisation, pointed out that council staff who transport children to school would not be subject to the same rules as they’re regulated differently -cabbies say the discrepancy is unfair. “The whole thing is supposed to be for public safety, but it doesn’t affect anybody besides the drivers,” Mr Hussain said. “Council employees who pick up vulnerable kids and take them to school – this doesn’t apply to them. If a taxi or private hire driver takes those very same people up and takes them to school or hospital – it’s all about public safety. It’s double standards. “We’re seeing institutional racism within the council here. We were promised a fair consultation, which has not been delivered.”
In response, the council said that suggestions of racism in the development of the policy were “categorically incorrect”. It added: “Leeds City Council is legally required to have a licensing regime specifically for taxis and private hire vehicles, which must be based on statutory guidance from the DfT. “A full equality, diversity, cohesion and integration screening con- cludes that the policy meets the council’s public sector equality duty.” A consultation over the changes held earlier this year found cabbies were overwhelmingly against the move, although members of the public who responded were in favour of tougher sanctions. The council had originally proposed the threshold for potential bans be seven points, but upped that to
nine points
following the consultation. The group leader of Leeds’ Conservative opposition, Cllr Andrew was critical of the council’s decision and said he would have it “called in” for further scrutiny. That means a cross-party panel would publicly discuss the matter and potentially recommend changes or that the move be abolished, although the final decision would remain with the council. In that context, the move is unlikely to be reversed. Cllr Carter told the executive board: “It seems to me over the last 15 years that the condition and suitability of private hire vehicles in Leeds has come on light years. Why use a sledgehammer to crack a nut?”
OCTOBER 2022 PHTM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86
