IN THE NEWS
COUNCIL TELLS MANCHESTER CABBIES TO CHARGE MORE THAN METER OVER JUBILEE HOLIDAY
Cab drivers have been told that they will have to charge customers more money than it states on the meter during the Jubilee bank holidays. According to the Manchester Evening News, Manchester cabbies have been told to calculate a 33 per cent increase per journey, during the period, as their meters are not programmed to recognise the dates as bank holidays. One driver said that the council’s decision has caused ‘anguish’ among drivers, amid fears that drunken and rowdy customers may refuse to pay more than the metered fare.
In an email sent out to hackney drivers, Manchester City Council apologised for the ‘inconvenience’ and admitted that it is ‘not an ideal situation’. The email from the Licensing Unit reads: “All current taximeters fitted to the fleet are calendar taximeters. The last time the Tariff information was electronically input on the taximeters, all the known future public holiday dates were included so that the correct Bank Holiday Tariff would be displayed and auto- matically calculated without the need for any input by the driver. “The Platinum Jubilee celebrations have been organised since the taximeters were last updated so the taximeters will not recognise these new dates as Bank Holidays. “As these two dates are now official Bank Holidays, drivers are entitled to charge the Bank Holiday rate all day, on both days, but will have to work this out manually until 10pm.” It continues: “We would advise all
28
older people. We’re not soft but we don’t want confrontations that can be easily avoided and that’s what we’re going to get with the council’s plans. “It’s just going to give taxi drivers a bad name. There’s no posi- tives to it whatsoever. “It seems like they’ve just decided what
drivers to explain this to passengers before the journey commences. To assist drivers and passengers, we have produced a notice that should be displayed in the vehicle on these Jubilee Bank Holiday dates. “We’d advise drivers to ensure you have extra copies of this notice and bring it to the passenger’s atten- tion. The Unit will also do its best to distribute copies of this Notice amongst the hackney trade and trade reps can pick up copies at the Town Hall Extension Rates Hall reception.” Neil, a 60-year-old driver, told the Manchester Evening News: “I sent an email about a month ago asking what they were going to do and the reply I got was that they said they had no plans to introduce a fare increase. It just seems like a complete lack of initiative. “I only work during the day and this week alone I’ve had three people try and run off without paying. Imagine what it’s going to be like when there’s loads of drunk men. “I’m 60, I don’t fight with people in the street to try and get the money I’m owed. A lot of the drivers are
they’re going to do without actually looking at the practicalities of it.” As the bank holidays were announced 18 months ago, Neil argued that the meters should have been updated to reflect the change. However the Town Hall said that this would have been ‘logistically impossible’. A spokesman for Manchester City Council said: “In order for the meter of a taxi to be changed it has to be done manually and individually for each black cab in Manchester. This is so a fixed and fare rate for passengers can be maintained. “Given there are thousands of hackney carriages in Manchester it would be logistically impossible to change the fare for a single day, and then back again without causing significant disruption. “Unfortunately the council does not have the arbitrary authority to change rates, which requires a meeting of the council’s executive to confirm. “The council is working with the trade to try and find a solution with is both fair for the driver and passenger”.
JUNE 2022
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90
