search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Vol. 64, No. 3 Autumn 2019 194 Piracy…Again


T e ubiquity and normality of online access in the developed world is a boon for many of us, especially for consumers. We can locate items we want or need from sources all over the world, compare prices to fi nd the best deals, and arrange for our purchases to arrive at our front doors, all without leaving our desks (or armchairs). For those of us who engage in research, we can (virtually) walk into an astonishing array of archives, libraries, museums, and other repositories, explore or


rummage through their


holdings, and locate information relatively quickly. Oſt en, it would require years of work and miles of travel to accomplish the same goals and, very oſt en, we also fi nd records and information that we might never even know was available. Even if the data we seek is not accessible online, our preparation for archival research is more thorough, making the actual visits much more eff ective.


T ere is, however, a darker side to this environment. Easy access to data combined with the ready availability of


technologies facilitated by online


distribution make illegal duplication of copyrighted material, both intellectual and physical, all too simple. T e sheer vastness of the scope of material open to online access also breeds a belief that everything should be freely available and, thus, lowers the threshold for appreciating the necessity and signifi cance of copyright for the development and distribution of new ideas and objects.


Exactly two years ago I wrote and published an editorial addressing this issue. T e Nautical Research Guild shortly thereaſt er also issued a strong statement of policy against piracy, which it also published on the modelshipworld.com website. I know that none of us involved in this process were so naïve as to think that such action would stop piracy, but the problem is of suffi cient gravity that it is incumbent on the Guild and its Journal to make strong eff orts to educate people about it.


Piracy has serious impacts. Authors who devote years to researching and writing their books, draſt ers who meticulously research and prepare the plans we use for our models, innovators who develop tools and fi xtures that ease or expedite our projects, designers who create the ever-expanding selection of kits we enjoy, all suff er when pirates come along and, without doing any of the work these individuals undertook to make these things for us, duplicate it and, because they stole the creators’ labor, sell it cheaply, destroying the fi nancial benefi ts these creative people deserve.


T e pace of piracy has not diminished signifi cantly. In some parts of the world, the pirating of books has reached the point that, quite oſt en, pirate editions appear on booksellers’ shelves before the actual publishers can ship their products and is leading publishing fi rms to quit the business entirely. Many kit designers and manufacturers are reluctant to release anything but very limited information about their current projects for the same reason. T is can cause them diffi culties; quite a few of the better regarded manufacturers appreciate the value of presenting prototypes so that experts on the subjects can give feedback on the accuracy of their work. Fear of having their work stolen inhibits this and results in potentially less accurate kits.


T e fundamental point about successful piracy, however, is not the pirates’ ease of access to other people’s property but the willingness of thousands of people to buy goods or services they have stolen. Every time one of us buys a pirated item, our short- term excitement over a bargain hastens the demise of innovation, the creators lose and so, ultimately, do we. While such a buyer is unlikely to face legal consequences, I and the Guild board urge everyone to think carefully about the long-term ramifi cations of purchasing pirated goods.


Editor—Paul E. Fontenoy


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100