search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUDAPEST AIRPORT


BARTA: A new stakeholder model to share the retail spoils?


For too long airports and airlines have paid lip service to the idea of creating tangible business co-operations to bolster ancillary activities. Kam Jandu, CCO Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport and Chairman of a new ‘BARTA’ initiative – which stands for Brand, Airline, Retailer, Technology Provider, and Airport – tells Luke Barras-Hill why things could be about to change...


B


ARTA, the new initiative which brings together an airline (Wizz Air), retailer


(Heinemann), technology provider (Flio) and airport (Budapest) is aiming to redefine the current operational challenges many airports and airlines face when it comes to ‘knowledge sharing’. Born out of an idea to drive


commercial spending in the terminals and onboard by harnessing the power of digital technology, the partners have engaged in a preliminary dialogue on the potential to create new sales channels, increase store penetration and ultimately, customer satisfaction. Kam Jandu, Chief Commercial


Officer, Budapest Airport, has agreed to act as Chairman for the BARTA project and facilitate the partnership in his capacity as the airport operator. BARTA, he believes, yields encouraging signs to increase commercial spending for all stakeholders involved. “I believe that the potential


is significant and once the main principles are laid out, such as not trying to sell or promote competing products, which an airline can sell onboard, all parties can benefit.”


Potential new model The obvious question is how will BARTA work in practice? At the time TRBusiness went


to press,


conversations on the initiative and its exact mechanics were still ongoing. It is anticipated that Budapest


Airport, Wizz Air and Gebr Heinemann will begin a live test trial, involving a revenue sharing component, later this year, but


JUNE 2017


Budapest Airport: the Launchpad for a potentially ‘gamechanging’ initiative to drive incremental retail spending in the air and on the ground.


concrete detail on how it would work was not immediately available at the time of writing. Nonetheless, Jandu makes clear


that initial conversations have swayed away from focusing acutely on the revenue-sharing component at this stage, to instead looking at certain complimentary products that will benefit all stakeholders mutually over time. Possible examples include the


redemption of vouchers to put towards an inflight meal on Wizz Air linked to certain spend levels in Heinemann’s duty free shop. Such an offer would be attractive to


Wizz Air in increasing spend on F&B onboard, while in turn Heinemann could assess the suitability of certain routes to correlate with aligned duty free promotions. For the airline itself, scaling up


non-aeronautical activities has the positive effect of offsetting future increases in aeronautical charges, Jandu suggests.


While the charges won’t be reduced, they will look to be maintained on the basis that growth in associated non-aeronautical activities will help to sustain its cost base. “The more we persuaded them


that it’s not to compete with them, the bigger the benefit that they saw,” says Jandu. “Now, they’re much warmer to the idea.” Another potential example could


be duty free discount vouchers linked to higher tiered airline ticket bookings, which could be redeemed at a Heinemann store or onboard. It is understood that a core principle


“This conversation wouldn’t


have taken place two to three years ago as everyone was competing for customer spends, but now there is a degree of maturity.”


Kam Jandu, Chairman, BARTA TRBUSINESS 21


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78